Maybe you are not wrong. MF may be more accurate as others posted but with
MF it depends on the ability/vision of the photographer to manual focus. So,
if your eyesight is not great then AF (of a good camera) may provide better
results. Also, for tracking moving subjects AF may be better (for most
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: EOS Canon 24-85 vs Sigma 24-70/2.8 vs Sigma 28-70/2.8
How about the Tokina?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nabil
> Esphahani
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Since at the time being I can not afford the Canon Ls (24-70 or 28-70),
I am looking for opinions regarding the above three lenses. I would
prefer the Sigma 24-70/2.8 but if either of the other two provides
better performance I would pick one of them.
Thanks
*
***
**
I just recently bought a D60 and find that it is a great camera (for
what is available today in terms of quality/price). I did have the Nikon
5700 for a while and found it not satisfying in terms of shutter lag and
higher noise than D60. It also had very poor autofocus compared to D60
and the D60 i
The Contax has been in stores for a while now.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-eos@;a1.nl] On Behalf Of Tom Pfeiffer
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 7:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EOS 1Ds
John, the 1Ds wasn't the first, Contax announced the 6mp Contax
Why not lock the exposure value before taking your eye away from the
finder?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-eos@;a1.nl] On Behalf Of Alex
Zabrovsky
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 3:50 PM
To: EOS list
Subject: FW: EOS3 viewfinder and eyepiece shutter
This is t
I have an opportunity to buy some demo equipment from a store. With regards
for warranty and any applicable rebates, is this equipment considered new?
Or does the manufacturer keep track of units given to stores as demos, and
treat these differently? Is there any reason to avoid demo equipment?
N
