RE: EOS Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX HSM

2003-02-05 Thread Stephen J. Krogh
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephen J. > Krogh > > Sorry for the late reply. Thanks for the proof reading, just a slip in > typing, faster than thinking. It was the same lens- the HSM version for > Canon.

RE: EOS Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX HSM

2003-02-03 Thread Stephen J. Krogh
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kotsinadelis, > Peter (Peter) > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:11 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: EOS Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX HSM > > > > > Ste

RE: EOS Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX HSM

2003-01-30 Thread Stephen J. Krogh
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex > Zabrovsky > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: EOS Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX HSM > > > Hi. > > Would be glad to hear user's opinions about Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX HSM t

RE: EOS Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX HSM

2003-01-30 Thread Stephen J. Krogh
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: EOS Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX HSM > > > > > -Original Message- &g