- Original Message -
From: David Malek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm wondering if there is any data about the quality of images with IS
> cheaper lenses as compared to L lenses without IS? As i'm considering also
> buying a 28-70 L
> 2.8 ... and already have a 28-135 i'm wondering if it's wor
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/13/01 10:38AM >>>
>>> Where did you find these MTF tests? Photodo.com? If so, where exactly. I
>>> couldn't seem to find them. But I'd love to see other tests for non-L
>>> series lenses. Or if anyone else knows a reliable source for EF lens tests,
>>> I'd appreciate
Trenton Burd wrote:
> Secondly, here is the comparison using Photodo tests.
>
> 28-135mm IS Weighted MTF for 28 mm: f3.5 0.73, f8 0.74
> 28-70 F2.8L Weighted MTF for 28 mm: f2.8 0.77, f8 0.81
>
> 28-135mm IS Weighted MTF for 50 mm: f4.5 0.81, f8 0.82
> 28-70 F2.8L Weighted MTF for 40 mm
> Secondly, here is the comparison using Photodo tests.
>
> 28-135mm IS Weighted MTF for 28 mm: f3.5 0.73, f8 0.74
> 28-70 F2.8L Weighted MTF for 28 mm: f2.8 0.77, f8 0.81
>
> 28-135mm IS Weighted MTF for 50 mm: f4.5 0.81, f8 0.82
> 28-70 F2.8L Weighted MTF for 40 mm: f2.8 0.75, f4 0.81
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/12/01 03:58PM >>>
>>> Hi maybe the question sound strange but i've just bought a 70-200. And i'm
>>> really concerned by its weight.
>>> I'm wondering if there is any data about the quality of images with IS
>>> cheaper lenses as compared to L lenses without IS? As i'm co
David Malek schrieb:
>
> Hi maybe the question sound strange but i've just bought a 70-200. And i'm
> really concerned by its weight.
>
> I'm wondering if there is any data about the quality of images with IS
> cheaper lenses as compared to L lenses without IS? As i'm considering also
> buying a
In a message dated 7/12/01 2:56:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< I'm wondering if there is any data about the quality of images with IS
cheaper lenses as compared to L lenses without IS? As i'm considering also
buying a 28-70 L
2.8 ... and already have a 28-135 i'm wo
--- Ken Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Provided you use proper technique (tripod, mirror
> lockup etc.), I don't
> think you will find evidence the EF28-135 will give
> you a better result than
> the EF28-70L. While the cost may be highter than it
> should be, the superior
> quality and faster
> Hi maybe the question sound strange but i've just bought a 70-200. And i'm
> really concerned by its weight.
>
I'll gladly take it off your hands :-)
> I'm wondering if there is any data about the quality of images with IS
> cheaper lenses as compared to L lenses without IS? As i'm consideri
David Malek wrote:
Hi maybe the question sound strange but i've just bought a 70-200. And i'm
really concerned by its weight.
I'm wondering if there is any data about the quality of images with IS
cheaper lenses as compared to L lenses without IS? As i'm considering also
buying a 28-70 L
2.8 ...
Hi maybe the question sound strange but i've just bought a 70-200. And i'm
really concerned by its weight.
I'm wondering if there is any data about the quality of images with IS
cheaper lenses as compared to L lenses without IS? As i'm considering also
buying a 28-70 L
2.8 ... and already have a
11 matches
Mail list logo
