>> Julian Loke wrote:
>> So, assume that you have ASA 100 film loaded. First meter
>> your scene, then lock your exposure in manual mode.
> "F. Craig Callahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok; I wasn't thinking manual. That would be too complicated for
> my "students." :-)
Hi Craig,
You remind
Julian Loke wrote:
> You reminded me of another loss that I lament, having moved from
> an EOS 1000FN to the Elan 7E.
>
> On the 1000FN, setting a Tv value would be carried over the M
> mode.
> [snip]
> Not so on the Elan 7E. Tv and Av has their own memory, separate
> from M mode. . . . No won
Julian Loke wrote:
> So, assume that you have ASA 100 film loaded. First meter your
> scene, then lock your exposure in manual mode.
Ok; I wasn't thinking manual. That would be too complicated for my "students."
:-)
Craig
*
***
**
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Bantel
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EOS 7 and EOS 5/A2
>
>
> Alan Bell wrote:
> > That night I went Ritz camera to
> "F. Craig Callahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That link didn't work for me in the form that it appeared in your
> message. Perhaps I'm being dense but I don't see how messing with
> the ISO setting could affect only the flash output, in the absence
> of any controls on the flash itself. . . .
Hi Julian,
That link didn't work for me in the form that it appeared in your message.
Perhaps I'm being dense but I don't see how messing with the ISO setting could
affect only the flash output, in the absence of any controls on the flash
itself. . . .
fcc
Julian
>> Julian Loke wrote:
>> Can you do the ISO indexing trick with the N65?
> "F. Craig Callahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This would be for. . . ?
Flash exposure compensation, of course. See:
http://www.geo.tu%2Dfreiberg.de/docs/eos%2Dfaq/3flash.html#q9
Cheers
Julian Loke
*
***
Julian Loke wrote:
> Does the Rebel 2000 / EOS 300 have a control for Flash exposure
> compensation?
Ah . . . I guess it doesn't. I don't own one myself, and I thought I remembered
that the ones the girls had did; perhaps that's the reason I gave them all Elan
7 brochures! Now I don't remember
Julian Loke wrote:
>
> Does the Rebel 2000 / EOS 300 have a control for Flash exposure
> compensation?
>
No, it doesn't.
regards,
Johan
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phome
> "F. Craig Callahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...
> I might mention that some of the controls of the N65 seem less
> easy to use than those of the RebelDOF preview, for example.
> Also, we were unable to discover a way to manually dial in flash
> exposure compensation on the N65 (she's misplac
Thomas Bantel wrote:
> > Alan Bell wrote:
> > Finally, I bit the bullet and did an exhaustive comparison of
> > Canon and Nikkor lenses on Photodo and Photozone.
> > In general, the Canons beat the Nikkors.
> Well, maybe the teles. Nikon still has a slight edge IMHO on the wide side.
> What I
yet bought
will act.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of F. Craig
> Callahan
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EOS 7 and EOS 5/A2
>
>
>
> This isn't ammunition
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ken Durling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry - don't know much about NIkon: is SW the equivalent of
> Canon's USM?
Yes, Ken - SW standing for Silent Wave. Exact same technology as USM
and Sigma's HyperSonic Motor and presumably licensed from the same
inventors as Ca
Ken Durling wrote:
>
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 11:22:29 -, you wrote:
>
> >
> >Yes, their SW lenses are a *lot* more expensive than the normal AF or
> >AF-I versions of the same lens. In the UK, the 80-200/2.8 is pretty
> >much twice the price to have the SW version.
>
> Sorry - don't know much
On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 11:22:29 -, you wrote:
>
>Yes, their SW lenses are a *lot* more expensive than the normal AF or
>AF-I versions of the same lens. In the UK, the 80-200/2.8 is pretty
>much twice the price to have the SW version.
Sorry - don't know much about NIkon: is SW the equivalent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Bantel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What I don't understand is, why Nikon uses silent wave only in
> > expensive lenses and fails to combine it with their version of IS.
> > This will cost them a bunch of customers.
>
> Yes, their S
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Bantel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I don't understand is, why Nikon uses silent wave only in
> expensive lenses and fails to combine it with their version of IS.
> This will cost them a bunch of customers.
Yes, their SW lenses are a *lot* more expensive than
Alan Bell wrote:
>
> A couple of people have asked this question. First off, this is a camera
> history that spans about 35 years. Second, I have been happy with the Nikon
> system. I only moved from the 8008 to the N70 because the 8008 was stolen. I
> moved from the N70 to the N80 because--suppo
Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No. There's no such thing as . Buy a vowel -- I use Nikon.
A quarter in the potty-mouth jar for you. Say that at my house and you'll
get your mouth washed out with soap. ;-)
> And, there is no Easter Bunny.
Oh, that is just plain cru
y, June 05, 2001 2:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EOS 7 and EOS 5/A2
>
>
> Alan Bell wrote:
> >
> > By the way, all. I'm a long time Nikon user who just switched to Canon.
> > Here's my odyssey:
> >
> > 1. Pentax K1000
> > 2
Alan Bell wrote:
>
> By the way, all. I'm a long time Nikon user who just switched to Canon.
> Here's my odyssey:
>
> 1. Pentax K1000
> 2. Canon A1
> 3. Nikon 4004
> 4. Nikon 8008
> 5. Nikon N70
> 6. Nikon N80
> 7. Canon EOS 3
>
Hi Alan,
that's an interesting camera history ;-) What made you
From: Alan Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Alan !
(...)
> 7. Canon EOS 3
Oh ! Can we know your brand switch reasons ??! :)
You must understand that we are very curious :o)
Welcome in the EOS land :)
--
-- PhOTo -- vOYaGe -- GrAPhiSMe --
Portail : http://perso.magic.fr/drocha
Groupe français Can
"No. There's no such thing as . Buy a vowel -- I use Nikon. Five
letters, two of which are vowels and no asterisks."
To Caesar which is of Caesar! Well done Henry!
Kind regards
Félix
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including
Behalf Of Henry
> Posner/B&H Photo-Video
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 7:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EOS 7 and EOS 5/A2
>
>
> No. There's no such thing as . Buy a vowel -- I use Nikon. Five
> letters, two of which are vowels and no asterisks. And, there
At 08:49 PM 06/01/2001, you wrote:
> Heheh that's a good one, Henry. However, TTL does save on flash recharge
>times,
As does the auto circuit on my Metz 60 CT1 and the "thyristor" in
my Vivitar 283. In both cases, the unused portion of the capacitor charge
(which would have been u
At 07:46 PM 06/01/2001, you wrote:
>Henry uses N*k*n? I feel like someone just told me there's no Easter
>Bunny. ;-)
No. There's no such thing as . Buy a vowel -- I use Nikon. Five
letters, two of which are vowels and no asterisks. And, there is no Easter
Bunny. He flunked his refresher cours
I don't agree 100% but there is definitely a need for a flash-ready
light and flash exposure OK light in the finder! It must be one of
those patent things, just like the fact that the EOS cameras do not have
"trap-focus" capabilities!
Mr. Bill
*
***
*
> "Jim Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...
> And Julian, as to the 'other' features of the E-TTL 'system', the only
> thing I'm missing is high speed synch. I'm not sure why I'm missing it
> though, I haven't really needed it. I just think one day I might need
> it :-)
Hi Jim,
My old REBEL had
On Fri, 01 Jun 2001 23:45:41 -, you wrote:
>--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Pattie Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Henry uses N*k*n? I feel like someone just told
>> me there's no Easter Bunny.
>
>I've met the Easter Bunny; he shoots strictly EOS.
>
>Dan
Calls himself the EOSter Bunny,
> At 11:55 PM 05/31/2001, you wrote:
> > I'm not going to say E-TTL is a load of hogwash, but my old EOS 10
using
> >TTL only gives me great results, in all conditions. I decided no body
> >upgrade was needed for E-TTL.
>
> I'm not going to say TTL is a load of hogwash, but my old Nikon FM2n u
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Pattie Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henry uses N*k*n? I feel like someone just told
> me there's no Easter Bunny.
I've met the Easter Bunny; he shoots strictly EOS.
Dan
*
***
***
* For list
Henry Posner wrote:
[snip]
> I'm not going to say TTL is a load of hogwash, but my old Nikon FM2n using
> the flash's auto feature only gives me great results, in all
> conditions. I
> decided no body
> upgrade was needed for TTL.
Henry uses N*k*n? I feel like someone just told me there's no Ea
At 11:55 PM 05/31/2001, you wrote:
> I'm not going to say E-TTL is a load of hogwash, but my old EOS 10 using
>TTL only gives me great results, in all conditions. I decided no body
>upgrade was needed for E-TTL.
I'm not going to say TTL is a load of hogwash, but my old Nikon FM2n using
the fl
>> Jim Davis wrote . . .
>> I believe for those willing to do a bit of testing, and gain
>> the knowledge needed to know what's going on, TTL is just as
>> good, maybe better than E-TTL any day of the week. It does have
>> advantages, see no pre-flash!
> "Dan Honemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Jim Davis wrote . . .
> I believe for those willing to do a bit of testing, and gain
> the knowledge needed to know what's going on, TTL is just as
> good, maybe better than E-TTL any day of the week. It does have
> advantages, see no pre-flash!
You make some very interesting points, Jim.
D
ver, Colorado
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Davis
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 9:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EOS 7 and EOS 5/A2
> I'm not going to say E-TTL is a load of hogwash, bu
> "GerryPalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now that the EOS 7 is out and about, does anyone have any opinion about
it
> > as compared to the A2/5? Aside from the command dial problem, is the
> > technology of the older camera too radically out of date anymore? I also
> > realize it has flash li
"GerryPalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that the EOS 7 is out and about, does anyone have any opinion about it
> as compared to the A2/5? Aside from the command dial problem, is the
> technology of the older camera too radically out of date anymore? I also
> realize it has flash limitations
Now that the EOS 7 is out and about, does anyone have any opinion about it
as compared to the A2/5? Aside from the command dial problem, is the
technology of the older camera too radically out of date anymore? I also
realize it has flash limitations, but between its price, spot metering, and
a f
39 matches
Mail list logo
