No comparison.
Get the 70-200L.
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am thinking of buying a zoom lens.
>
> I am looking at the 75-300 IS and the 70-200 L F4.
>
Hi Jerome,
The 70-200/4 is an exceptional lens for the price and image quality is
excellent. It is also a faster focussing lens than the 75-300
I am thinking of buying a zoom lens.
I am looking at the 75-300 IS and the 70-200 L F4.
I like the idea of having IS and an extra 100mm. And I also like the fact that it is
about $415 for the IS lens as opposed to $579 for the L lens.
I am interesting in using it for travel photography mostly,
--- Rick Bilbro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am considering this lens for a walkaround with no
> tripod lens, such as the
> zoo etc. I currently have a Canon 70-210/3.5-4.5 USM
> which I think takes
> real nice pictures. Will I be disappointed in the
> sharpness, etc with the
> 70-300IS? Does
I am considering this lens for a walkaround with no tripod lens, such as the
zoo etc. I currently have a Canon 70-210/3.5-4.5 USM which I think takes
real nice pictures. Will I be disappointed in the sharpness, etc with the
70-300IS? Does the IS slow things down as far as focusing speed?
Thanks
