Robert Meier wrote:
>
> --- Skip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually, you need reinstalled Windows 98; Windows
> > 95, an upgrade to 98
> > or ME doesn't work, either, from what I've heard.
> > Skip
>
> If I remember correctly somebody on this list said
> that the only thing you need is USB
--- Skip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, you need reinstalled Windows 98; Windows
> 95, an upgrade to 98
> or ME doesn't work, either, from what I've heard.
> Skip
If I remember correctly somebody on this list said
that the only thing you need is USB support.
Therefore, if you do it manua
> Anonymous wrote:
>
> >> One difference that hasn't been pointed out between the EOS-1v and
> >> the EOS-3 is the ability of the EOS-1v to store exposure data, if
> >> attached to a computer.
And someone who failed to watch posts of a few weeks ago said,
> > True, but unless you have a Windows
Andy White wrote:
>> One difference that hasn't been pointed out between the EOS-1v and
>> the EOS-3 is the ability of the EOS-1v to store exposure data, if
>> attached to a computer. Using this, if someone asks you information
>> about a particular photo, you can say, with certainty, "it w
Andy White wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 09:30:33 -0700, Tom DelRosario wrote:
>
> >One difference that hasn't been pointed out between the EOS-1v and the EOS-3 is the
>ability of the EOS-1v to store
> exposure data, if attached to a compute
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 09:30:33 -0700, Tom DelRosario wrote:
>One difference that hasn't been pointed out between the EOS-1v and the EOS-3 is the
>ability of the EOS-1v to store
exposure data, if attached to a computer. Using this, if someone asks yo
One difference that hasn't been pointed out between the EOS-1v and the EOS-3 is the
ability of the EOS-1v to store exposure data, if attached to a computer. Using this,
if someone asks you information about a particular photo, you can say, with certainty,
"it was taken at 1/90 at f/8".
Admitt
