Stephen Cysewski wrote:
What camera case would you recommend to hold a 17-35, 28-70, and 70 to
200 lenses and a single body. I would prefer to have one of the lenses
mounted on the camera and have the lens hoods mounted on the lenses. I
want to carry the case, the lenses, and the camera, and to
I've found packs to be a very personal thing and sadly admit to having quite
a few for different occasions. I use a LowePro SuperTreker for carrying
70lbs of camera gear and a tiny bit of food :-) when camping for more than a
day. I've also been very pleased with a much lighter, much less padded f
Stephen Cysewski wrote:
> What camera case would you recommend to hold a 17-35, 28-70, and 70 to
> 200 lenses and a single body. ...
I've found my Kinesis setup to work very well for a very similar set of
equipment. http://www.kinesisgear.com/
-- Rich
*
***
***
> Hello Stephen,
>
> I would suggest the LowePro Mini-Trekker for your combination
>(http://www.lowepro.com)
>
> Shashvat
>
> ~What camera case would you recommend to hold a 17-35, 28-70, and 70 to
> ~200 lenses and a single body. I would prefer to have one of the lenses
> ~mounted on the came
rous weapon if carried on board
a plane.
The cost of the bag was around Aussie $200 which is roughly USD$100.
Regards,
Lawrance Lee
Original Message Follows
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:51:02 +0530
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shashvat Sinha)
Subject: RE: EOS Camera Case L Zooms
Hello Stephen,
I
: EOS Camera Case L Zooms
~
~
~What camera case would you recommend to hold a 17-35, 28-70, and 70 to
~200 lenses and a single body. I would prefer to have one of the lenses
~mounted on the camera and have the lens hoods mounted on the lenses. I
~want to carry the case, the lenses, and the camera
What camera case would you recommend to hold a 17-35, 28-70, and 70 to
200 lenses and a single body. I would prefer to have one of the lenses
mounted on the camera and have the lens hoods mounted on the lenses. I
want to carry the case, the lenses, and the camera, and to have them
easily accessibl
