--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Huguley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is an interesting article in the most recent issue of Pop
> Photo that compares Canon's "IS" to Nikon's "VR" featured lens.
The few comments I have read on Nikon's only VR lens is that it is
dire - not a patch on Canon.
From: Scott Huguley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Anyone out there with a copy that can verify my recollections or maybe add
> clarification or more information?
Thanks for the list Scott.
<°+°> PhOTo <°+°> GrAPhiSMe <°+°>
Portail : http://perso.magic.fr/drocha
Groupe français Canon EOS :
http://www.gr
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The point I'm trying to make is - this lens can NOT even be compared to
> Canon IS 100-400 lens - Canon is that much better.
It's the result obtained when you compare both tests of the Nikon VR lens
and the 100-400 IS, in Chasseur d'Images...
<°+°> PhOTo <°+°> GrAPh
In a message dated 8/7/01 11:17:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< 1. Both systems are good and worth the investment. >>
Well, I have to disagree.
This is a typical phrase for the Pop Photo. ( I only buy it to keep up with
current prices in mail order houses) Unfortunate
on 8/7/01 12:51 PM, Daniel ROCHA at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have unfortunately not read it ! Can you put here the main ideas developped
> in the article ?! :)
>
Don't have the article in front of me but as I remember main points were:
1. Both systems are good and worth the investment.
2
From: Scott Huguley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Scott !
> The article was, however, interesting and I was wondering if others
> had read it and what your thoughts were.
I have unfortunately not read it !
Can you put here the main ideas developped in the article ?! :)
<°+°> PhOTo <°+°> GrAPhiSMe <°+
There is an interesting article in the most recent issue of Pop Photo that
compares Canon's "IS" to Nikon's "VR" featured lens. I knew before reading
the article that neither would be a clear winner because Pop Photo cannot
risk upsetting either of their best advertisers. The article was, howeve
