On Mon, 21 May 2001, Bob Meyer wrote:
> --- Terry Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It depends entirely on how the claims are drafted
> > and allowed. You can't
> > meaningfully discuss what a patent covers in the
> > abstract. You have to
> > read and construe the claims of the partic
--- Terry Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2001, Bob Meyer wrote:
>
> > Because the patent office is full of idiots who
> don't
> > understand technology that's how. But even here,
> it's
> > the specific process that's patented. If a
> competitor
> > could come up with a si
