Also the Tokina 28-80 2.8 is a really nice lens. Is a little bigger
but is a lot faster than the ones you mentiond.
--
Harrison McClary
http://www.mcclary.net
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*ht
>
> Hi,
>
> In this order:
>
> 1- The one with the best photographer behind it.
>
> 2- Either the 24-85 or the 28-105, in my opinion.
>
> Have you considered the 28-135 IS? This one helps with my first answer
> above, by preventing motion blur.
>
> Pierre
>
Hi David,
Let me clarify what the 28-
>
> Hi guys,
> One question on ,
> 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
> 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM
> 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM
> Whish takes better quality photos?
> Which lens should I buy?
> Sorry for bothering with (probably) already discussed topic, but
> (unfortunately) I'm not so rich to waste my money on so
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:20:53 +0400, you wrote:
>28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/browse.php?id=photographer:203
*
***
***
* For list instructions, inc
Hi,
In this order:
1- The one with the best photographer behind it.
2- Either the 24-85 or the 28-105, in my opinion.
Have you considered the 28-135 IS? This one helps with my first answer
above, by preventing motion blur.
Pierre
At 18:20 2/15/2002 +0400, you wrote:
>Hi guys,
>One question
Hi guys,
One question on ,
24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM
28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM
Whish takes better quality photos?
Which lens should I buy?
Sorry for bothering with (probably) already discussed topic, but
(unfortunately) I'm not so rich to waste my money on something that isn't
g
