Re: EOS OT: Photographic calcultors (was 20-35 with extension tubes)

2001-03-06 Thread Bob Talbot
> When choosing the 20-35, it was helpful to do some optical > calculations. So I made a Javascript lens calculator > intended eventually for eosdoc. The current draft is at: > http://members.home.net/jul.loke/ Julian where *all* these calculations really break down (especially when trying t

Re: EOS OT: Photographic calcultors (was 20-35 with extension tubes)

2001-03-06 Thread Julian Loke
Hi Gang, When choosing the 20-35, it was helpful to do some optical calculations. So I made a Javascript lens calculator intended eventually for eosdoc. The current draft is at: http://members.home.net/jul.loke/ The formulae used were from David Jacobson's Lens FAQ http://www.photo.net/photo/j

RE: EOS OT: Photographic calcultors (was 20-35 with extension tubes)

2001-03-06 Thread Paul Youd
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Grega Fenko Sent: 05 March 2001 10:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: EOS OT: Photographic calcultors (was 20-35 with extension tubes) > I'm currently using f/Calc, are there any other similar pr

Re: EOS OT: Photographic calcultors (was 20-35 with extension tubes)

2001-03-05 Thread Grega Fenko
- Original Message - From: "Andreas W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:44 PM Subject: EOS OT: Photographic calcultors (was 20-35 with extension tubes) > > The reason may be, that it's plain simply

EOS OT: Photographic calcultors (was 20-35 with extension tubes)

2001-02-28 Thread Andreas W
> The reason may be, that it's plain simply true. DOF depends on focal length. > Pick your favorite DOF calculator and try it out. I'm currently using f/Calc, are there any other similar programs I should check out? I also think I heard something about a Palm version of f/Calc, is that true? Tha