David Magradze wrote:
>
> Thanks to everyone who responded to my question,
>
> One more thing - probably it's not right to approach thing like that,
> but at B&H
> 28-105mm costs 250$
> and
> 24-85mm costs 320$.
> Does it mean itself that 24-85mm is the better lens?
>
> David
>
> GOD! I wish t
Thanks to everyone who responded to my question,
One more thing - probably it's not right to approach thing like that,
but at B&H
28-105mm costs 250$
and
24-85mm costs 320$.
Does it mean itself that 24-85mm is the better lens?
David
GOD! I wish to I have enough money to buy both (and more)
