Tom DelRosario wrote:
> I thought that L series meant a lens was built better and more expensive. In
>looking at a catalog, it appears that all the TS-E models are the same price, yet
>only one of them is L. . . .
>
> What differentiates the L-series lenses from the other lenses?
The "L" le
http://www.usa.canon.com/eflenses/technology/lseries.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
Tom DelRosario wrote:
> I thought that L series meant a lens was built better and more expensive. In
>looking at a catalog, it appears that all the TS-E models are the same price, yet
>only one of them is L. It also appears that the 100-300/4.5-5.6 is roughly the same
>price as the 100-300/5
On Wed, 03 Oct 2001 17:32:04 -0700 "Tom DelRosario"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought that L series meant a lens was built better and more
> expensive. In looking at a catalog, it appears that all the TS-E
> models are the same price, yet only one of them is L. It also
> appears that t
I thought that L series meant a lens was built better and more expensive. In looking
at a catalog, it appears that all the TS-E models are the same price, yet only one of
them is L. It also appears that the 100-300/4.5-5.6 is roughly the same price as the
100-300/5.6, but only one of the is L
