Hello Robin,
| My thanks to everyone who has taken the time to respond.
|
| Food for thought. If you can hear a lot of clicking noises coming from
| Scotland, it's only me blinking as I try to come to a decision!
And I thought it was the Mighty Midges! Or maybe it was the Tories (1)
celebratin
My thanks to everyone who has taken the time to respond.
Food for thought. If you can hear a lot of clicking noises coming from
Scotland, it's only me blinking as I try to come to a decision!
Robin Johnston.
*
***
***
* For list
> I have the 100-400L and this is an excellent lens. I have used it
> mainly for sports so far. It gives AF with the 1.4tc.
At the long end you'll need an EOS 3 to maintain AF (atleast according to Canon)
because then it becomes a 560/8.
> As to other lenses, I don't
> have any to compare, but
>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 15:03:35 EDT
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EOS Telephoto Lens Choice
...
>
> I am really tempted to buy 100 - 400L but before I do so I
> wondered if there
> might be a better choice given the uses I will be putting it
> to. The FD 300
> 4.0L images really s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I do a lot of candids at weddings and social events. I also cover a lot of
> equestrian events and use FD 35-105 3.5, 70-210 4.0 and 300 4.0L. I plan to
> sell most of my FD gear and have indicated this on the FD list.
>
> I plan to buy another EOS 3.
>
> I am really
At 12:36 PM -0700 6/7/01, Ken Durling wrote:
>[...] I just think that indoors at formal
>events a white lens looks too military or something.
I was at a huge wedding in Seattle last weekend. The paid
photographer, who took photos of all the guests posing with the bride
and groom, had spraypa
2001 8:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EOS Telephoto Lens Choice
>
> I guess it makes the thing look less appealing to thieves. If you're
> worried about the white lenses you could always try that approach. :)
*
***
*
Ken Durling wrote:
> events a white lens looks too military or something. I would consider
> getting the by-all-reports superb (and black) EF 200mm f/2.8L and
> using it with a 1.4 TC if you really need all that reach.
Yes, superb, even with the 1.4x extender (and excellent with the 2x extend
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Robin,
(...)
> I am really tempted to buy 100 - 400L but before I do so I wondered if
> there
> might be a better choice given the uses I will be putting it to. The FD
> 300 4.0L images really sparkle.
> So my question is: Best choice or is there a better (but not mu
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001 15:03:35 EDT, you wrote:
>Due to changing eyesight I am having real difficulty in focussing in churches
>etc. with my trusty FD equipment. I have taken delivery of a new EOS 3 with
>28-135 USM IS.
>
>This is going to solve a lot of problems for me - it is superb!
>
> I do a l
10 matches
Mail list logo
