Re: EPEL Clang package doesn't work on Amazon Linux

2014-04-01 Thread Dave Johansen
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Anssi Johansson wrote: > 1.4.2014 23.11, Tyler Brock kirjoitti: > > Thanks so much for looking into this Dave. Yes, libstdc++ was installed. >> > > It might be worth mentioning that the Amazon-provided libstdc++-devel is > 4.6.3-3.10.amzn1, and it doesn't seem to

Re: EPEL Clang package doesn't work on Amazon Linux

2014-04-01 Thread Jérôme Fenal
2014-04-01 22:27 GMT+02:00 Jérôme Fenal : > 2014-04-01 22:23 GMT+02:00 Dave Johansen : >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Tyler Brock wrote: >>> >>> Thanks so much for looking into this Dave. Yes, libstdc++ was installed. >>> >>> Any other thoughts? >> >> >> libstdc++-devel is the one you need to

Re: EPEL Clang package doesn't work on Amazon Linux

2014-04-01 Thread Jérôme Fenal
2014-04-01 22:23 GMT+02:00 Dave Johansen : > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Tyler Brock wrote: >> >> Thanks so much for looking into this Dave. Yes, libstdc++ was installed. >> >> Any other thoughts? > > > libstdc++-devel is the one you need to check, because that's the one with > the headers and

Re: EPEL Clang package doesn't work on Amazon Linux

2014-04-01 Thread Anssi Johansson
1.4.2014 23.11, Tyler Brock kirjoitti: Thanks so much for looking into this Dave. Yes, libstdc++ was installed. It might be worth mentioning that the Amazon-provided libstdc++-devel is 4.6.3-3.10.amzn1, and it doesn't seem to provide /usr/include/c++/4.4.4/iostream like the CentOS version doe

Re: EPEL Clang package doesn't work on Amazon Linux

2014-04-01 Thread Dave Johansen
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Tyler Brock wrote: > Thanks so much for looking into this Dave. Yes, libstdc++ was installed. > > Any other thoughts? > libstdc++-devel is the one you need to check, because that's the one with the headers and such. ___

EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report

2014-04-01 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 709 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 56 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6 51 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED

EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report

2014-04-01 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 709 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 164 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 44 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updat

Re: EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread Simone Caronni
On 1 April 2014 13:55, Simone Caronni wrote: > On 1 April 2014 12:58, Susi Lehtola wrote: > >> Uhm, so this is just about a virtual Provides? >> >> TeXLive *does* have latex. Just install texlive-latex. >> > > Ok, I confirm is related to the texlive version in RHEL 7. > I reworked all the BuildRe

Re: EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread Simone Caronni
On 1 April 2014 12:58, Susi Lehtola wrote: > Uhm, so this is just about a virtual Provides? > > TeXLive *does* have latex. Just install texlive-latex. > Ok, I confirm is related to the texlive version in RHEL 7. I reworked all the BuildRequires in the SPEC file with the "new" texlive syntax (i.e

Re: EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread Susi Lehtola
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 12:52:17 +0200 Simone Caronni wrote: > On 1 April 2014 11:42, Susi Lehtola wrote: > > > > Ok, I found the issue. The texlive in EPEL 7 is too old and does not > > > contain the sub-packages I'm using. > > > I hope they will update it before release; texlive 2013 was released

Re: EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread Simone Caronni
On 1 April 2014 11:42, Susi Lehtola wrote: > > Ok, I found the issue. The texlive in EPEL 7 is too old and does not > > contain the sub-packages I'm using. > > I hope they will update it before release; texlive 2013 was released mid > > 2013 and we're now in 2014. > > You can probably forget abou

Re: EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread पराग़
Hi, On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote: > On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:39:05 +0200 > Simone Caronni wrote: > >> On 1 April 2014 11:26, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Simone Caronni >> > wrote: >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > is there any plan to have texlive

Re: EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread Susi Lehtola
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:39:05 +0200 Simone Caronni wrote: > On 1 April 2014 11:26, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Simone Caronni > > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > is there any plan to have texlive in EPEL 7? > > > > The texlive package already exists in RHEL7. See

Re: EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread Simone Caronni
On 1 April 2014 11:26, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Simone Caronni > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > is there any plan to have texlive in EPEL 7? > > The texlive package already exists in RHEL7. See > http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/x86_64/os/Packages/ > Ok, I foun

Re: EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread पराग़
Hi, On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > is there any plan to have texlive in EPEL 7? The texlive package already exists in RHEL7. See http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/x86_64/os/Packages/ Regards, Parag. ___ epe

EPEL epel beta report: 20140401 changes

2014-04-01 Thread EPEL Beta Report
Compose started at Tue Apr 1 08:15:03 UTC 2014 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 2ping-2.0-2.el7.noarch requires perl(Digest::CRC) RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires rdesktop RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires perl-Gtk2

EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread Simone Caronni
Hello, is there any plan to have texlive in EPEL 7? I need it but wouldn't dare asking for the branch myself... looks complicated and I don't have any direct experience with it. Thanks & regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore