Re: EPEL Reformed Steering Committee

2014-08-29 Thread Carl George
Howdy! Currently the ius-release package depends on epel-release. This is because several of our packages have dependencies from EPEL. Would these new proposed repos be supplementary to the current EPEL, or something else? Here are the current IUS mailing lists. Core developers: core...@iusc

Re: EPEL Reformed Steering Committee

2014-08-29 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On 29 August 2014 15:03, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Hi >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> >>> At last week's EPEL meeting, it was proposed that at least a short term >>> governing comm

Re: EPEL Reformed Steering Committee

2014-08-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 29 August 2014 16:15, Michael Stahnke wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > >> At last week's EPEL meeting, it was proposed that at least a short term >> governing committee be put together to help on the following items: >> >> 1) EPEL.next (EPIC or

EPEL Help on some ruby package for /Fedora

2014-08-29 Thread Michael Stahnke
I am primary point of contact on several ruby packages. Sadly, I haven't been able to give them the love and attention they need lately. I got into most of them when I had a different day job, and needed them in EPEL. Today I have less needs in that space. I'd love more co-maintainers, or even to o

Re: EPEL Reformed Steering Committee

2014-08-29 Thread Michael Stahnke
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > At last week's EPEL meeting, it was proposed that at least a short term > governing committee be put together to help on the following items: > > 1) EPEL.next (EPIC or EPEL-rolling, etc) > 2) Formalizing various amounts of unwritten

EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-08-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
So in todays (2014-08-29) meeting, we wanted to move the various policy discussions to email so that people could take their time to reply and also to allow for people who could not attend time to respond. Going from the web-page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL-faster-repo-ideas the following

Re: EPEL Reformed Steering Committee

2014-08-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 29 August 2014 15:03, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> At last week's EPEL meeting, it was proposed that at least a short term >> governing committee be put together to help on the following items: >> >> 1) EPEL.next (EPIC or EP

Re: EPEL Reformed Steering Committee

2014-08-29 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > At last week's EPEL meeting, it was proposed that at least a short term > governing committee be put together to help on the following items: > > 1) EPEL.next (EPIC or EPEL-rolling, etc) > Has there been any attempt to bring in t

EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report

2014-08-29 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 859 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 314 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 78 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updat

EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report

2014-08-29 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 859 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 191 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0590/oath-toolkit-2.0.2-4.el6 78 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/update

EPEL Reformed Steering Committee

2014-08-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
At last week's EPEL meeting, it was proposed that at least a short term governing committee be put together to help on the following items: 1) EPEL.next (EPIC or EPEL-rolling, etc) 2) Formalizing various amounts of unwritten rules for package addition, removal and maintenance in current repos. 3)

EPEL Summary of Meeting 2014-08-29

2014-08-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
#epel: EPEL (2014-08-29) Meeting started by smooge at 16:00:13 UTC. The full logs are available athttp://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/epel/2014-08-29/epel_weekly_meeting.2014-08-29-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary --- * meet and greets

Re: EPEL Reminder: 2014-08-29 meeting #epel

2014-08-29 Thread Jeff Sheltren
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 08/28/2014 11:11 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > We will be holding our weekly EPEL meeting tomorrow at 1600 UTC. > > > > Topics will be: > > > > 1) EPEL-7 moves out of Beta > > 2) EPEL. > > 3) Open Flood. > > I have another meet

Re: EPEL moving epel 7 out of beta

2014-08-29 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:53:06 +0200 Remi Collet wrote: > Le 28/08/2014 23:26, Dennis Gilmore a écrit : > > Hi All, > > > > Kevin and I working to move epel 7 out of beta, as of a few hours > > ago builds require bodhi updates to get pushed out. >

Re: EPEL Reminder: 2014-08-29 meeting #epel

2014-08-29 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 08/28/2014 11:11 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > We will be holding our weekly EPEL meeting tomorrow at 1600 UTC. > > Topics will be: > > 1) EPEL-7 moves out of Beta > 2) EPEL. > 3) Open Flood. I have another meeting that runs to 16:30, will drop in right after and would really like to t

EPEL EPIC minor release branches

2014-08-29 Thread Jens Petersen
Hi, I read the log from last weeks EPEL meeting [1]. It is great to see discuss happening on (codename:) EPIC. :-) At Flock at the EPEL.next session there was mention of using branches/tags per minor EL version for EPIC for greater long term flexibility, which I thought sounded pretty attractive: