Hi,
I read the log from last weeks EPEL meeting [1].
It is great to see discuss happening on (codename:) EPIC. :-)
At Flock at the EPEL.next session there was mention of using
branches/tags per minor EL version for EPIC for greater long term flexibility,
which I thought sounded pretty
On 08/28/2014 11:11 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
We will be holding our weekly EPEL meeting tomorrow at 1600 UTC.
Topics will be:
1) EPEL-7 moves out of Beta
2) EPEL.fill-in-blank
3) Open Flood.
I have another meeting that runs to 16:30, will drop in right after and
would really
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:53:06 +0200
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote:
Le 28/08/2014 23:26, Dennis Gilmore a écrit :
Hi All,
Kevin and I working to move epel 7 out of beta, as of a few hours
ago builds require bodhi updates to get
#epel: EPEL (2014-08-29)
Meeting started by smooge at 16:00:13 UTC. The full logs are available
athttp://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/epel/2014-08-29/epel_weekly_meeting.2014-08-29-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
* meet and
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
859
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
191
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0590/oath-toolkit-2.0.2-4.el6
78
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
859
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
314
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
78
Hi
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
At last week's EPEL meeting, it was proposed that at least a short term
governing committee be put together to help on the following items:
1) EPEL.next (EPIC or EPEL-rolling, etc)
Has there been any attempt to bring in the
So in todays (2014-08-29) meeting, we wanted to move the various policy
discussions to email so that people could take their time to reply and also
to allow for people who could not attend time to respond.
Going from the web-page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL-faster-repo-ideas the following
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
At last week's EPEL meeting, it was proposed that at least a short term
governing committee be put together to help on the following items:
1) EPEL.next (EPIC or EPEL-rolling, etc)
2) Formalizing various amounts
Hi
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 29 August 2014 15:03, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
At last week's EPEL meeting, it was proposed that at least a short term
Howdy!
Currently the ius-release package depends on epel-release. This is because
several of our packages have dependencies from EPEL. Would these new proposed
repos be supplementary to the current EPEL, or something else?
Here are the current IUS mailing lists.
Core developers:
11 matches
Mail list logo