#8: EPEL-latest link rpm
-+--
Reporter: smooge | Owner: smooge
Type: enhancement | Status: accepted
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Policy problem |Version:
Resolution: |
#8: EPEL-latest link rpm
-+
Reporter: smooge | Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Policy problem |Version:
Resolution:
#6: Fix EPEL subject line in mailman
--+
Reporter: smooge | Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Package request |Version:
Re
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/epel/2014-10-31/epel.2014-10-31-20.01.log.html
Meeting summary
---
* Meats and Greats (smooge, 20:02:30)
* Old Business (smooge, 20:04:30)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/epel/ticket/8 is what I mean
(Evolution, 20:08:05)
* ticket 2 (smooge,
#4: Decide on criteria to unretire packages.
-+
Reporter: till| Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: task| Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Policy problem |Version:
#4: Decide on criteria to unretire packages.
-+
Reporter: till| Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Policy problem |Version:
Re
#2: How to handle systemd service activation defaults in EPEL7
-+
Reporter: orion | Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: task| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: EPEL-7
Component: Policy
#22: Meeting Agenda for 2014-10-10
--+
Reporter: smooge | Owner: smooge
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Package request |Version:
Resolution: worksfo
On 10/31/2014 4:44 AM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Fred Wittekind
mailto:r...@twister.dyndns.org>> wrote:
>
>
> On 8/7/2014 1:29 PM, Fred Wittekind wrote:
>
> On 8/5/2014 5:55 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
>
> Hi Fred,
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Fred Witteki
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> > +%epel %{?rhel}%{!?:rhel:7}
>
> typo alert ^^ (in the second part), but hopefully you get the idea.
>
> Or, if you'd rather not depend on %rhel macro, and just hard-code to 7,
> that
> would be fine too.
>
The approach
Rex Dieter wrote:
> +%epel %{?rhel}%{!?:rhel:7}
typo alert ^^ (in the second part), but hopefully you get the idea.
Or, if you'd rather not depend on %rhel macro, and just hard-code to 7, that
would be fine too.
-- Rex
___
epel-devel mailing list
ep
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote on Oct 16:
>
>> I'd like to be able to conditionalize some package features depending on
>> if
>> epel repo is enabled or not. One way to accomplish that goal is if epel-
>> release defined some macro, say, something like %{epel}, similar to
>> %{feodra} or %
Rex Dieter wrote:
> I'd like to be able to conditionalize some package features depending on
> if
> epel repo is enabled or not. One way to accomplish that goal is if epel-
> release defined some macro, say, something like %{epel}, similar to
> %{feodra} or %{rhel}
>
> (I don't care what the mac
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3454/rubygem-httpclient-2.4.0-2.el7
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3432/drupal7-7.32-1.el7
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Fred Wittekind
wrote:
>
>
> On 8/7/2014 1:29 PM, Fred Wittekind wrote:
>
> On 8/5/2014 5:55 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
>
> Hi Fred,
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Fred Wittekind
wrote:
> >
> > How soon might a el7 version of this package be available? I can
#8: EPEL-latest link rpm
-+
Reporter: smooge | Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Policy problem |Version:
Resolution:
16 matches
Mail list logo
