On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> It might be this in your spec:
>
> #%global gcc_vr 4.8.2-16.2.el7_0
>
> # is not a comment in a spec file. The %global is still expanded.
> Replace % with # or something to make it not do so.
That was it. Thanks for the assistance!
__
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 03:50:40 -0600
Eric Smith wrote:
> Bug #1203649 was reported against dragonegg, which is tied to the
> specific version of gcc it is built against, because it uses the gcc
> plugin interface. EL7.1 has a newer gcc, so dragonegg has to be
> rebuilt. I did a new build (fedpkg bu
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
128
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
22
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0862/nodejs-0.10.36-3.el7,libuv-0.10.34-1.el7,v8-3.14.5.10-17.
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1063
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
128
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4008/cross-binutils-2.23.51.0.3-1.el6.1
116
https://admin.fedoraproject
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1063
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
517
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
282
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda
Bug #1203649 was reported against dragonegg, which is tied to the
specific version of gcc it is built against, because it uses the gcc
plugin interface. EL7.1 has a newer gcc, so dragonegg has to be
rebuilt. I did a new build (fedpkg build from epel7 branch), but it
still built against gcc from EL7
