[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 755 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893 libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 519 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 369 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upda

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 249 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 145 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7 53 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.or

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 145 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 128 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 122 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.o

Re: [EPEL-devel] Any news on alternative arch support?

Hi, > I would like to report on what we have been doing with EPEL on s390x. > > At the last IRC meeting (September 4), bstinson suggested that I report bugs > for EPEL package build failures on s390x. A couple of us at IBM have been > doing that over the past couple of months, and even provided fi

[EPEL-devel] Any news on alternative arch support?

Hello EPEL devs, I would like to report on what we have been doing with EPEL on s390x. At the last IRC meeting (September 4), bstinson suggested that I report bugs for EPEL package build failures on s390x. A couple of us at IBM have been doing that over the past couple of months, and even provi