On 26 February 2016 at 21:01, Dave Johansen wrote:
> It looks like EPEL 5/6 have old versions of scl-utils. Those are probably
> added back at a point when the base OS didn't have them, but they are now
> older versions than what's available in the base OS.
> Should EPEL
It looks like EPEL 5/6 have old versions of scl-utils. Those are probably
added back at a point when the base OS didn't have them, but they are now
older versions than what's available in the base OS.
Should EPEL versions be removed?
Dave
___
epel-devel
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
251 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
233 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
227
Am 19.02.2016 um 16:53 schrieb Dave Johansen:
> But as was also mentioned, a lot of packages have jumped on the Chrome
> bandwagon with crazy release cycles and maintaining security fixes in those
> cases is basically impossible for a volunteer effort. From my perspective,
> having a policy that
Hi
Do you think you will build it also for i386 arch ?
Thx
De : Mukundan Ragavan
À : epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Envoyé le : Vendredi 26 février 2016 0h15
Objet : [EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED