On 02/18/2016 01:39 PM, Bryan J Smith wrote:
Non-Red Hat customers running CentOS usually have a much easier task
of enabling EPEL, although there can still be some issues.
Yes it is a bit odd to me that the free CentOS is in many respects
easier to use than the paid RHEL.
Would be nice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/26/2016 05:01 AM, john tatt wrote:
> Hi
>
> Do you think you will build it also for i386 arch ?
>
> Thx
>
>
I don't think COPR supports 32-bit for EPEL-7 ... So, no plans at the
moment.
- --
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
- ---
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/27/2016 03:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:17:39 + (UTC) john tatt
> wrote:
>
>> Hi I sis a yum install xfce4* . Maybe xfwm4 was not in the
>> dependencies ?
>
> Thats not going to work. Xfce has
Hi
I sis a yum install xfce4* . Maybe xfwm4 was not in the dependencies ?
J
De : Kevin Fenzi
À : epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc : john tatt
Envoyé le : Samedi 27 février 2016 21h02
Objet : [EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:50:42 -0600
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I'm actually just going to submit a review for a python2-setuptools
> dummy package to take care of the most annoying case. If someone
> really dislikes this idea enough to block that, then I guess I'll
> find
Q:
Do you understand the purpose of RHSCL PR EPEL? ;)
You want RHEL, but neither RHSCL nor EPEL is it, nor designed to be it.
That's why I said ...
EPEL's ideal aimpoint, when feasible, should be like RHSCL. ;)
-- bjs
DISCLAIMER: Sent from phone, please excuse any typos
--
Bryan J Smith -
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Felix Schwarz
wrote:
> Also as a sysadmin I dislike that stuff in EPEL can change at any time
> (whenever the maintainer can not support the old version anymore). If EPEL had
> some kind of "release" (e.g. tied to RHEL point releases)
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> On 26 February 2016 at 21:01, Dave Johansen
> wrote:
> > It looks like EPEL 5/6 have old versions of scl-utils. Those are probably
> > added back at a point when the base OS didn't have
Hi
it seems to come without windows manager. Had to uninstall.
De : Mukundan Ragavan
À : epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Envoyé le : Vendredi 26 février 2016 0h15
Objet : [EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7
-BEGIN PGP