> "DJ" == Dave Johansen writes:
DJ> To my knowledge mock for EL 5 has been broken for several months
DJ> now:
I've had no problems using it. I did rebuild all of EPEL5 at least ten
times recently and while there were plenty of failures I'm pretty sure
those failures
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:47:42 -0700
Dave Johansen wrote:
> To my knowledge mock for EL 5 has been broken for several months now:
>
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> Something went wrong when epel-rpm-macros-5 was added to the EPEL5
> buildroot such that it works fine in koji but isn't actually present
> when you build in mock. So if you were trying to de-cruft your specs
>
Something went wrong when epel-rpm-macros-5 was added to the EPEL5
buildroot such that it works fine in koji but isn't actually present
when you build in mock. So if you were trying to de-cruft your specs
and found that things weren't working as you expected when you did a
mock build, that's why.
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:47:25 +0100
James Hogarth wrote:
...snip...
> How do others feel and does the Steering Committee feel it might be
> time to revisit the SCL question?
I'm against using SCL in epel until there are approved Fedora
guidelines.
The FPC folks know
HI all,
I was just wondering how the rest of the EPEL community felt in this area
and if perhaps teh EPEL Steering Committee might want to review policies
surrounding SCL use.
There's a growing need for more modern language versions in the EL world.
I've only just encountered this situation in
Hi everybody
Where are we now with the project of 32bits epel7 repo ?
Thanks
De : Kevin Fenzi
À : epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc : john tatt
Envoyé le : Vendredi 29 janvier 2016 23h05
Objet : [EPEL-devel] Re: 32 bit revisited
On Fri, 29