I doubt anyone is using but as a heads up, I am planning on retiring
pam_script from epel5.
If you are using the epel5 package and would like to maintain it just
apply for ACLs and I'll hand them over.
JT
___
epel-devel mailing list
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 08/11/2016 07:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 08/11/2016 05:16 AM, Zuzana Svetlikova wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> As some of you may know, nodejs package that is present in
>>> EPEL is pretty outdated. The current
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
532 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
295 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
57
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> > "DJ" == Dave Johansen writes:
>
> DJ> devtoolset is designed to do all of this and is already done, so it
> DJ> seems that the only advantage to putting it in EPEL itself would be
>
> "DJ" == Dave Johansen writes:
DJ> devtoolset is designed to do all of this and is already done, so it
DJ> seems that the only advantage to putting it in EPEL itself would be
DJ> to reduce the number of repos during build time.
So is devtoolset something I get