[EPEL-devel] Re: Django stable RPMs

On 08/11/16 16:31, Brian Bouterse wrote: > I believe the future of Django in EPEL is a topic that is being > discussed on the EPSCO meetings last week and this week (18:00 UTC on > Wednesdays in #fedora-meeting, iirc). > > I'm hoping that even if a newer, 1.8 based Django package is added to >

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPSCO meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPSCO meeting on 2016-11-09 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux Steering COmmittee (EPSCO) has a weekly meeting to go over concerns and problems in

[EPEL-devel] Re: Django stable RPMs

On 8 November 2016 at 10:31, Brian Bouterse wrote: > I believe the future of Django in EPEL is a topic that is being discussed on > the EPSCO meetings last week and this week (18:00 UTC on Wednesdays in > #fedora-meeting, iirc). > > I'm hoping that even if a newer, 1.8 based

[EPEL-devel] Re: Django stable RPMs

I believe the future of Django in EPEL is a topic that is being discussed on the EPSCO meetings last week and this week (18:00 UTC on Wednesdays in #fedora-meeting, iirc). I'm hoping that even if a newer, 1.8 based Django package is added to EPEL6, that the existing one named Django14 can be kept

[EPEL-devel] Django stable RPMs

Afternoon, I'm currently working through the final stages of a new release for Patchwork [1]. One of the things that's been discussed extensively in the past is the versions of Django we support. Most sysadmins refuse to use packages outside of those provided by their distro (i.e. no pip).