On 3 November 2017 at 17:28, Peter Rex wrote:
> You seem to be the guy who does the builds. If you could advise, despite the
> grumpiness:
>
> Since updating Ansible playbooks, tasks, libraries and such to work with a
> more current Ansible version isn't practical, on existing
You seem to be the guy who does the builds. If you could advise, despite
the grumpiness:
Since updating Ansible playbooks, tasks, libraries and such to work with a
more current Ansible version isn't practical, on existing servers, we're
thinking of adding "exclude=ansible1.9 ansible" to the
They aren't very smart. I'm pretty sure I could pin the blame on Ricardo.
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Manuel Wolfshant
wrote:
> On 11/03/2017 06:09 AM, Peter Rex wrote:
>
> Security flaws mean nothing to the application I use Ansible for, but
> stability does.
Ah thanks, I ended up finding the 1.9.6-2 version on a mirror that hadn't
been updated yet. Seems to work fine.
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> On 3 November 2017 at 00:09, Peter Rex wrote:
> > Security flaws mean nothing to
El Viernes 03/11/2017 a las 13:12, Manuel Wolfshant escribió:
> On 11/03/2017 05:40 PM, Ricardo J. Barberis wrote:
> > El Viernes 03/11/2017 a las 12:09, Stephen John Smoogen escribió:
> >> OK how can we better explain this in the future? There seems to be
> >> some sort of misunderstanding that
> "SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes:
SJS> OK how can we better explain this in the future?
I really tried, in the "Can I rely on these packages?" section of the
EPEL wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL#Can_I_rely_on_these_packages.3F
Someone already quoted
On 11/03/2017 05:40 PM, Ricardo J. Barberis wrote:
El Viernes 03/11/2017 a las 12:09, Stephen John Smoogen escribió:
OK how can we better explain this in the future? There seems to be
some sort of misunderstanding that EPEL is giving the same guarentees
as a paid for product from Red Hat.
I
El Viernes 03/11/2017 a las 12:09, Stephen John Smoogen escribió:
> OK how can we better explain this in the future? There seems to be
> some sort of misunderstanding that EPEL is giving the same guarentees
> as a paid for product from Red Hat.
I can't remember which one it was, but there was a
On 3 November 2017 at 00:09, Peter Rex wrote:
> Security flaws mean nothing to the application I use Ansible for, but
> stability does. Control servers are in private networks, and they configure
> equipment guarded by murderous thugs, so no problem there.
>
> The control
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
970 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
732 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
315
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
848 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
842 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
732
11 matches
Mail list logo