On 04/11/2018 03:29 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> These were koschei builds of my epel7 packages. Seems to have cleared up now
> though so perhaps just an import issue.
>
> On 04/10/2018 08:18 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> Do you have any information that htis is EPEL packages or just EL7.5
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
19 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-1fbdf7f103
chromium-65.0.3325.181-1.el7
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-2074629ed3
drupal7-7.58-1.el7
12
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-e4e96fbf3f
drupal7-7.58-1.el6
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b5d9f8f571
wordpress-4.9.5-1.el6
7
These were koschei builds of my epel7 packages. Seems to have cleared up now
though so perhaps just an import issue.
On 04/10/2018 08:18 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Do you have any information that htis is EPEL packages or just EL7.5 items?
>
> On 10 April 2018 at 09:57, Orion Poplawski
On 11 April 2018 at 20:32, Dylan Silva wrote:
> I am very afraid I am jumping into a lion's den here... However, I am going
> to try to alleviate some concerns.
>
> Our move from EPEL to Extras was actually to solve for the needs of RHEL and
> the RHEL System Roles. We
I am very afraid I am jumping into a lion's den here... However, I am going to
try to alleviate some concerns.
Our move from EPEL to Extras was actually to solve for the needs of RHEL and
the RHEL System Roles. We needed to be in a channel that customers could
consume from that wasn't EPEL.
On 11 April 2018 at 10:02, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Alexander Bokovoy
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not in Ansible engineering or product management so take this with a
>> grain of salt. My understanding is that cadence of Ansible
On 11 April 2018 at 14:30, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 04/11/2018 04:52 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>>
>> Especially if EPEL7 now has a clash with an optional repo that is available
>> to all subscribers...
>>
>> There are priority or exclude filters people will need to add to their
On 04/11/2018 04:52 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> Especially if EPEL7 now has a clash with an optional repo that is available
> to all subscribers...
>
> There are priority or exclude filters people will need to add to their yum
> repository configurations that they may not be otherwise aware of
On 04/10/2018 11:05 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> At this point, no offense to Nirik and the maintenance he does on the
> package, I'm actually tempted to just grab it from upstream directly at
> https://releases.ansible.com/ansible/rpm/
Feel free. Do whatever you feel is best for you.
>
> At
On 04/11/2018 02:04 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> There probably should be an announcement sent to the epel announce
> list then it gets to a wider audience so more people know this.
Yep. But the RH announcement only went out monday, and I am at a
hackfest this week. I'll try and get something out
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 10:05 Peter Robinson, wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > James Hogarth wrote:
> >> I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible
> >> from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> James Hogarth wrote:
>> I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible
>> from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL
>> policy is not to conflict.
>>
>> I was surprised just
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 01:26 Todd Zullinger, wrote:
> James Hogarth wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote:
> >> Red Hat announced today that Ansible was being deprecated
> >> from the extras channel. Their advice is that those who
> >> have
14 matches
Mail list logo