[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2020-05-07 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 632 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 374 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80 python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7 372

[EPEL-devel] Re: What to do about python 3.4 in EPEL7?

2020-05-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 05. 20 19:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Would it be needed if we moved from say python 3.6 to python 3.8? If there is enough people going to work on this, python 3.8 can be introduced as %python3_other. But I guess python 3.6 is going to be maintained the entire life of rhel7? AFAIK

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

2020-05-07 Thread tdawson
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-05-08 from 21:00:00 to 22:00:00 UTC At freenode@fedora-meeting The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname EPEL #topic

[EPEL-devel] Re: What to do about python 3.4 in EPEL7?

2020-05-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 12:11:58PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 05. 20 11:46, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Question: should I be using %{python3_pkgversion} at all? Some packages > > still use it, e.g. python3-ply (python36-ply binary package), and > > some don't. > > 0) It is

[EPEL-devel] Re: What to do about python 3.4 in EPEL7?

2020-05-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 05. 20 11:46, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Question: should I be using %{python3_pkgversion} at all? Some packages still use it, e.g. python3-ply (python36-ply binary package), and some don't. 0) It is no longer required from technical point of view. 1) There was no

[EPEL-devel] Re: What to do about python 3.4 in EPEL7?

2020-05-07 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 07 May 2020 at 05:07, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 5/6/20 4:31 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 06. 05. 20 3:39, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > This is related to my breaking of various packages by dropping > > > python34-six. Should we: > > > > > > - re-add python34-six > > > > For now,

[EPEL-devel] Re: What to do about python 3.4 in EPEL7?

2020-05-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 05. 20 5:07, Orion Poplawski wrote: FWIW, leaves appear to be: # repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=epel* --whatrequires python34 | while read pkg; do [ -z "$(repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=epel* --whatrequires $pkg --alldeps --recursive)" ] && echo $pkg; done Not sure

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2020-05-07 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-aa01e58571 openvpn-2.4.9-1.el6 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c8a92d6324 wordpress-5.1.5-1.el6 The following builds have been