[EPEL-devel] Re: kf5-5.68.0-3.el8 not in Bodhi?

2020-08-31 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 15:13 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > I'm not sure why this version (-3) wasn't put in bodhi. > But I've had to tag it into override to get a package built. And my > package built successfully, so I'm pretty sure it works. > Anyway, I've put it in bodhi, so giving it some karma w

[EPEL-devel] Re: kf5-5.68.0-3.el8 not in Bodhi?

2020-08-31 Thread Troy Dawson
I'm not sure why this version (-3) wasn't put in bodhi. But I've had to tag it into override to get a package built. And my package built successfully, so I'm pretty sure it works. Anyway, I've put it in bodhi, so giving it some karma would get it to stable faster. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/

[EPEL-devel] kf5-5.68.0-3.el8 not in Bodhi?

2020-08-31 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Hi, I'm trying to rebuild nextcloud-client for EPEL8, and it uses %cmake_kf5. Even a no-op rebuild is now failing, and it turns out the culprit was that the working nextcloud-client-2.6.5-8.el8 build was done when kf5-5.68.0-3.el8 was in a buildroot override, and it has since expired. https://koj

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2020-08-31 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 747 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 487 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7 196 https://bodhi.fedoraproject

[EPEL-devel] Re: Continuing playground discussion

2020-08-31 Thread Troy Dawson
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 7:08 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 09:43, Troy Dawson wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:44 AM kevin wrote: >> > >> >> > > Thoughts? >> > >> > Well, I think it satisfies all the use cases, but... we barely have >> > enough cycles to tr

[EPEL-devel] Re: Continuing playground discussion

2020-08-31 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 09:43, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:44 AM kevin wrote: > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Well, I think it satisfies all the use cases, but... we barely have > > enough cycles to try and revamp playground. Do we think we have enough > > to do that and also ma

[EPEL-devel] Re: Continuing playground discussion

2020-08-31 Thread Troy Dawson
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:44 AM kevin wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 03:11:49PM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > Pros for building against stream: > > > - We would have a way to test EPEL packages that matter against the > > > not yet released RHEL version. > > > -- How often would this matter