The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-58bc048b1a
upx-3.96-9.el8
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a20d7c1ddd
rxvt-unicode-9.26-1.el8
9
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 08:29:17AM -0400, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> I have opened a bugzilla to get an EPEL8 branch for pdsh [1], and I've also
> reached out to the current maintainers directly and have not heard anything
> back. I am not sure what the next steps are in getting an EPEL8 build of
>
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-06-02 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-06-02 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
I have opened a bugzilla to get an EPEL8 branch for pdsh [1], and I've also
reached out to the current maintainers directly and have not heard anything
back. I am not sure what the next steps are in getting an EPEL8 build of
pdsh. I would be happy to become the maintainer of the EPEL builds for
I agree. Thing is they seem to use EPEL as-it with priorities set in all
the repos. Think I'll discuss it further with Amazon.
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 at 08:38, Manuel Wolfshant
wrote:
> On 6/1/21 8:21 AM, Danie de Jager wrote:
> > It was trivial to compile from src RPM I was just wondering in this
On 6/1/21 8:21 AM, Danie de Jager wrote:
It was trivial to compile from src RPM I was just wondering in this scenario,
should Amazon compile rpmconf and add this package to their base? Or is there
something else I'm not considering?
I'd say it's up to Amazon to include the package in their
