On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:40:19AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> It is a fairly manual process where a person volunteers to sit in
> front of the firehose every day and deal with these requests. The
> person who has to process them has a checklist of policy items they
> have to confirm/check
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 08:58:15PM +1100, Frank Crawford wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm looking at building a package that currently exists in EPEL8 for
> EPEL9. I have a new branch epel9 branch for my package, but when I try
> to do a mock build or scratch build it fails with the error:
>
> Error: Err
On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 22:30 +1100, Frank Crawford wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 06:18 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 6:13 AM Troy Dawson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:58 AM Frank Crawford
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Folks,
> > > >
> > >
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 09:25, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I have two questions regarding epel9:
>
> 1) I have requested dozen of epe9 branches for my packages. It was 20+ hours
> ago. E.g.
> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/39402
> Is it manual process? Or is the automatio
On 13. 12. 21 15:25, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Hi.
I have two questions regarding epel9:
1) I have requested dozen of epe9 branches for my packages. It was 20+ hours
ago. E.g. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/39402
Is it manual process? Or is the automation broken?
The tickets
Hi.
I have two questions regarding epel9:
1) I have requested dozen of epe9 branches for my packages. It was 20+ hours ago. E.g.
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/39402
Is it manual process? Or is the automation broken?
2) It was quite pain to go through all my packages and f
Hello.
Considering that EPEL 9 Next repo is an **additional** repo to EPEL 9 (is that
still the case?), should EPEL 9 overrides be visible for EPEL 9 Next builds?
They are currently not.
Also, consider 2 different builds of package foo:
- foo-1.0-1.el9.next in stable EPEL 9 Next
- foo-1.0-
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 06:21, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 6:13 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:58 AM Frank Crawford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> I'm looking at building a package that currently exists in EPEL8 for
> >> EPEL9. I have a
On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 06:18 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 6:13 AM Troy Dawson
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:58 AM Frank Crawford
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > I'm looking at building a package that currently exists in EPEL8
> > > for
> >
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 6:13 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:58 AM Frank Crawford
> wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'm looking at building a package that currently exists in EPEL8 for
>> EPEL9. I have a new branch epel9 branch for my package, but when I try
>> to do a mock bu
10 matches
Mail list logo