The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-17ae719cb2
syncthing-1.18.6-3.el8
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-49fa7851f7
radare2-5.6.4-1.el8
The following builds have been
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b2c46a790d
radare2-5.6.4-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
cobbler-2.8.5-4.el7
Details about builds:
==
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 17:00, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 3/2/22 14:14, epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > Except that we are going to need python38-pytest, etc. in the EPEL8
> buildroot
> > if we are going to build (most of) the packages in the first place.
> That's
> > the problem I'm
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:01:20AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages to CRB. It seems to be the
> > easiest way to fix the original coccinelle build problem.
>
> This gets odder. I
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 6:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages to CRB. It seems to be the
> > easiest way to fix the original coccinelle build problem.
>
> This gets odder. I see from
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages to CRB. It seems to be the
> easiest way to fix the original coccinelle build problem.
This gets odder. I see from our internal spreadsheet and downloads
that some of the ocaml packag
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 12:42:03PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:27 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 09:04:04AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > So why not have the OCaml toolchain exposed in RHEL CRB? It sounds
> > > like it would be very beneficia
