On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 8:52 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
> What do others think?
Almost everything *I* care to do with el eventually
needs epel and/or CRB/Powertools.
I also do not think CRB/Powertools should be
auto-enabled by epel (epel does not own them,
and should not touch them).
And, yes, a
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
tio-1.38-1.el7
Details about builds:
tio-1.38-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9dcbb8f45)
Simple TTY terminal I/O application
On 6/5/22 03:47, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 at 18:54, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 10:52 PM Troy Dawson
wrote:
>
> When I first created the EPEL issue to auto-enable crb repo[1] I
was only thinking of CAN we do it. I wasn't thinking SHOULD we
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 at 18:54, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 10:52 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> > When I first created the EPEL issue to auto-enable crb repo[1] I was
> only thinking of CAN we do it. I wasn't thinking SHOULD we do it.
> > We've come to the point that we actually can
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 10:52 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> When I first created the EPEL issue to auto-enable crb repo[1] I was only
> thinking of CAN we do it. I wasn't thinking SHOULD we do it.
> We've come to the point that we actually can do it. But before we go down
> that road, I wanted to
When I first created the EPEL issue to auto-enable crb repo[1] I was only
thinking of CAN we do it. I wasn't thinking SHOULD we do it.
We've come to the point that we actually can do it. But before we go down
that road, I wanted to take a step back and ask, should we do it.
The more I think
