[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL2RHEL - New Wording? - New Workflow?

2023-03-27 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 7:22 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > I see your point. It sometimes also happens when the EPEL package is a > dependency of the important package, the customers aren't actually asking for > the EPEL package. While I am sure that occasionally RH chooses to add a package to

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL2RHEL - New Wording? - New Workflow?

2023-03-27 Thread Troy Dawson
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 12:51 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 20. 03. 23 12:20, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> I could think of other reasons as well. E.g. it's not important for > customers > >> but it's important for Red Hat. Or maybe it is a not-so-important > dependency of > >> something else. > >> > >