[EPEL-devel] Re: Take the EPEL user and contributor survey 2023!

On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 16:03, Diego Herrera wrote: > Hello, everyone > > The Fedora EPEL SIG is asking for feedback to improve EPEL via this survey! > > * https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/2023 > > The link is incorrect and should be https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/epelsurvey2023 > The s

[EPEL-devel] Take the EPEL user and contributor survey 2023!

Hello, everyone The Fedora EPEL SIG is asking for feedback to improve EPEL via this survey! * https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/2023 The survey is targeting EPEL users and contributors. It asks about how you use EPEL, how you contribute to it, and on what would you need to improve that experi

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-ANNOUNCE incompatible update of caddy in EPEL 9

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 1:44 AM Carl George wrote: > > I am performing an incompatible upgrade of the caddy package in EPEL > 9. In accordance with the incompatible upgrade policy [0], I proposed > this upgrade just over a week ago on the epel-devel mailing list [1]. > For reasons detailed in the

[EPEL-devel] Re: Incompatible security update for llhttp in EPEL9

I just pushed this update to stable. On 8/17/23 9:08 AM, Ben Beasley wrote: This email announces that the llhttp package in EPEL9 will be upgraded from 6.0.10 to 8.1.1[1], which breaks the ABI and bumps the SONAME version, as discussed[2] and approved[3] under the EPEL Incompatible Upgrades Po