On 06/08/2013 09:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 7 June 2013 19:21, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>
>>
>> A tracking-mirror could go something like this:
>>
>> * Logs are rotated out to the trash regularly, e.g. 24 hours.[1]
>> * Data is g
find a way toward dropping non-anonymous
information without even a millisecond of retention. Such as, pulling
anonymous data to the dataset, then cleansing the stream toward privacy
before writing it to the log. For example, it might be sufficient for
troubleshooting to know a class C
people are
> looking for and not what they are looking for in a repo.
Just to continue down this path for a moment, what are the ways we can
track or get ideas of what is important to EPEL users? If we could
improve what we have already, how would we do so? (Let's pretend for a
moment that
