[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposing incompatible upgrade for zeek

2024-07-19 Thread Michel Lind
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:55:15PM -0500, Michel Lind wrote: > Hi all, > > EPEL 9 currently carries Zeek 4.2.0; per > https://github.com/zeek/zeek/wiki/Release-Cadence > > this is actually long out of support - x.0.z releases are LTS supported > for a year, x.y.z (y >=

[EPEL-devel] Proposing incompatible upgrade for zeek

2024-07-18 Thread Michel Lind
eds to be rebuilt: michel in zeek on  release/6.0 via △ ⬢ [fedora:40] ❯ fedrq whatrequires --src zeek-core -b epel9 michel in zeek on  release/6.0 via △ took 7s ⬢ [fedora:40] ❯ fedrq whatrequires --src zeek-devel -b epel9 Best regards, -- _o) Michel Lind _( ) identities: https://keyoxide.

[EPEL-devel] Re: libbotan-2 soname bump in EPEL 8

2024-07-18 Thread Michel Lind
t! > We've clarified the policy at the last EPEL meeting: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/#process_for_incompatible_upgrades you can now file the issue requesting an incompatible upgrade immediately, and we'

[EPEL-devel] Re: libbotan-2 soname bump in EPEL 8

2024-07-16 Thread Michel Lind
you need to file an issue and get approval at the EPEL meeting, you probably want to hold off on continuing for now. The meetings are on Wednesdays so we can take this up Wednesday next week if you file the EPEL issue next Tuesday (after allowing for a week of discussion). Best, -- _o) Mi

[EPEL-devel] Re: [EPEL-devel]Re: Clamav 1.0.x LTS lands on EPEL 8

2024-07-10 Thread Michel Lind
discussion at the weekly EPEL meeting. > > > > Hi Sergio - This is a reminder that per the incompatible upgrades > > policy, we are still waiting for an issue to be created and assigned > > the > > 'meeting' tag so that it can be voted on by the steering commitee. >

[EPEL-devel] Re: RFC: incompatible upgrade of catch for EPEL; packages that do not rebuild to be retargeted to catch2

2024-07-03 Thread Michel Lind
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 06:05:24PM -0500, Michel Lind wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 07:14:18PM -0500, Michel Lind wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I plan to upgrade catch in epel8 and epel9 to the latest 3.5.4 from Fedora, > > and introduce catch2 for packages that

[EPEL-devel] RFC: Adding the ability to specify what side tag should be used for scratch builds of a PR

2024-07-02 Thread Michel Lind
and this request is too Fedora-specific -- I notice Storyboard uses Ubuntu One for login, for instance. Best regards, -- _o) Michel Lind _( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[EPEL-devel] Re: RFC: incompatible upgrade of catch for EPEL; packages that do not rebuild to be retargeted to catch2

2024-06-25 Thread Michel Lind
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 07:14:18PM -0500, Michel Lind wrote: > Dear all, > > I plan to upgrade catch in epel8 and epel9 to the latest 3.5.4 from Fedora, > and introduce catch2 for packages that are currently using EPEL's catch (v2) > and won't rebuild against catch v3 > F

[EPEL-devel] RFC: incompatible upgrade of catch for EPEL; packages that do not rebuild to be retargeted to catch2

2024-04-30 Thread Michel Lind
regards, -- _o) Michel Lind _( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 OpenPGP_0x8B229D2F7CCC04F2.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ epel-devel

[EPEL-devel] Re: Anyone want to maintain openssl3 for epel8?

2024-04-22 Thread Michel Lind
On 4/22/24 17:03, Michel Lind wrote: I created this (tracking c9s' openssl package) since there were plans to start depending on openssl v3 in systemd back in 2022, but looks like that has not happened yet - and CentOS Hyperscale SIG is no longer updating our systemd package for c8s

[EPEL-devel] Anyone want to maintain openssl3 for epel8?

2024-04-22 Thread Michel Lind
) Michel Lind _( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 OpenPGP_0x8B229D2F7CCC04F2.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel

[EPEL-devel] Re: RFC: Proposing incompatible upgrade of python-asgiref from 3.4.1 to 3.7.2

2024-04-18 Thread Michel Lind
Hi all, On 4/11/24 16:25, Michel Lind wrote: Dear all, Django 4.2 (the only currently supported LTS series) requires asgiref >= 3.6, so I would like to propose updating python-asgiref in EPEL 9 at least to 3.6.0, but ideally to 3.8.1 for future proofing. The affected packages (maintain

[EPEL-devel] Re: RFC: Proposing incompatible upgrade of python-asgiref from 3.4.1 to 3.7.2

2024-04-16 Thread Michel Lind
On 4/16/24 15:56, Michel Lind wrote: I'll confirm whether we can go ahead with updating this at the EPEL meeting tomorrow, or we should wait a full week per https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/epel-docs/public/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/ since this blocks the packaging of python

[EPEL-devel] Re: RFC: Proposing incompatible upgrade of python-asgiref from 3.4.1 to 3.7.2

2024-04-16 Thread Michel Lind
Dear all, On 4/11/24 16:25, Michel Lind wrote: Dear all, Django 4.2 (the only currently supported LTS series) requires asgiref >= 3.6, so I would like to propose updating python-asgiref in EPEL 9 at least to 3.6.0, but ideally to 3.8.1 for future proofing. The affected packages (maintain

[EPEL-devel] Re: RFC: Django latest vs LTS maintenance plan

2024-04-16 Thread Michel Lind
Hi Kevin, On 4/12/24 11:45, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 03:41:02PM -0500, Michel Lind wrote: Hi all, With the recent EOL of the Django 3.2 LTS series[^1], and Django being a key component of our mailing list infra for both Fedora and CentOS, I would like to propose

[EPEL-devel] RFC: Proposing incompatible upgrade of python-asgiref from 3.4.1 to 3.7.2

2024-04-11 Thread Michel Lind
3.fc41.src Best regards, -- _o) Michel Lind (né Salim) _( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscri

[EPEL-devel] RFC: Django latest vs LTS maintenance plan

2024-04-11 Thread Michel Lind
, or if you have ideas of how to handle some of these better. [^1]: https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2024/apr/03/bugfix-release/ Best regards, -- _o) Michel Lind (né Salim) _( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[EPEL-devel] Re: RFC: updating python-poetry-core in EPEL 9 to 1.6.1

2024-02-19 Thread Michel Lind
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 01:44:34PM -0600, Michel Lind wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 01:27:18PM -0600, Michel Lind wrote: > > except for python-asyncmy: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/salimma/poetry-core-epel9-wip/build/7026743/ > > > Looks like thi

[EPEL-devel] Re: RFC: updating python-poetry-core in EPEL 9 to 1.6.1

2024-02-16 Thread Michel Lind
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 01:27:18PM -0600, Michel Lind wrote: > except for python-asyncmy: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/salimma/poetry-core-epel9-wip/build/7026743/ > Looks like this is a known issue fixed in 0.2.7: https://github.com/long2ice/asyncmy/blob/dev/CHA

[EPEL-devel] RFC: updating python-poetry-core in EPEL 9 to 1.6.1

2024-02-16 Thread Michel Lind
to this or not. If the asyncmy failure is related, I'll try and fix it (or try a lower version of poetry-core that let it be compiled) before doing official builds. Will probably let this sit until Monday to give people chance to comment. Best regards, -- Michel Lind identities: https://keyoxide.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Orphaning python-mistune on EPEL

2024-01-10 Thread Michel Lind
I assume somebody built this in > epel9 without taking responsibility. > > There is a low impact CVE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112231 > > If somebody want to maintain it, let me know and I'll make you the epel > point of contact. > Please mark me as the

[EPEL-devel] Re: Mailman3 web components for EPEL 9 now in Bodhi!

2023-12-21 Thread Michel Lind
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 02:13:26PM -0600, Michel Lind wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm happy to be able to provide this holiday present to the infra team > (and other interested parties) - after chasing through tens of > dependencies, going through multiple stalled EPEL requests, and evo

[EPEL-devel] Mailman3 web components for EPEL 9 now in Bodhi!

2023-12-21 Thread Michel Lind
etc. that have not been branched and built for EPEL 9 yet, let me know if you have a list and I'm happy to get to them next. Happy holidays, -- Michel Lind (né Salim) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 signature.asc Description: PGP signature