[EPEL-devel] Re: Bug report for dbus-c++-devel

2018-06-08 Thread Richard Grainger
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Anssi Johansson wrote: > So this is a FTBFS bug (fails to build from source). The package maintainer > will need to address this issue eventually, for example when the package > needs to be rebuilt to fix some other bug. In this view the bug is useful as > a

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bug report for dbus-c++-devel

2018-06-08 Thread Anssi Johansson
Richard Grainger kirjoitti 8.6.2018 klo 11.32: On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Anssi Johansson wrote: Is it considered a bug if you cannot build an EPEL package with the current point release of CentOS or is it not? My understanding is that older point releases are not supported or is that

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bug report for dbus-c++-devel

2018-06-08 Thread Richard Grainger
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Anssi Johansson wrote: > The dbus-c++ packages were built in March 2014. Perhaps the dependencies > have changed since then, causing the errors? Perhaps it builds better with > CentOS 7.0.1406. Is it considered a bug if you cannot build an EPEL package with the

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bug report for dbus-c++-devel

2018-06-07 Thread Anssi Johansson
Anssi Johansson kirjoitti 7.6.2018 klo 20.27: Richard Grainger kirjoitti 7.6.2018 klo 12.00: Hi all I've put in a bug report against an epel package here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585753 Typically, how long does it take for someone to look at these? The dbus-c++ packages

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bug report for dbus-c++-devel

2018-06-07 Thread Anssi Johansson
Richard Grainger kirjoitti 7.6.2018 klo 12.00: Hi all I've put in a bug report against an epel package here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585753 Typically, how long does it take for someone to look at these? The dbus-c++ packages were built in March 2014. Perhaps the