[EPEL-devel] Re: Django stable RPMs

2016-11-10 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 11/09/2016 03:13 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote: > On 2016-11-08 18:06, Matthias Runge wrote: >> On 08/11/16 16:31, Brian Bouterse wrote: >>> I believe the future of Django in EPEL is a topic that is being >>> discussed on the EPSCO meetings last week and this week (18:00 UTC on >>> Wednesdays in #f

[EPEL-devel] Re: Django stable RPMs

2016-11-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 11/09/2016 03:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:13:48 + Stephen Finucane wrote: ..snip... Yes, so Django 1.6 [2] is the one currently provided on EPEL 7. However, that's Python 2.7. Would it be possible to add a Python 3 version using Django 1.8? Alternatively (and this m

[EPEL-devel] Re: Django stable RPMs

2016-11-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:13:48 + Stephen Finucane wrote: ..snip... > > Yes, so Django 1.6 [2] is the one currently provided on EPEL 7. > However, that's Python 2.7. Would it be possible to add a Python 3 > version using Django 1.8? Alternatively (and this might be heresy), > what's the possibil

[EPEL-devel] Re: Django stable RPMs

2016-11-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 19:06:20 +0100 Matthias Runge wrote: > On 08/11/16 16:31, Brian Bouterse wrote: > > I believe the future of Django in EPEL is a topic that is being > > discussed on the EPSCO meetings last week and this week (18:00 UTC > > on Wednesdays in #fedora-meeting, iirc). > > > > I'm h

[EPEL-devel] Re: Django stable RPMs

2016-11-09 Thread Stephen Finucane
On 2016-11-08 18:06, Matthias Runge wrote: On 08/11/16 16:31, Brian Bouterse wrote: I believe the future of Django in EPEL is a topic that is being discussed on the EPSCO meetings last week and this week (18:00 UTC on Wednesdays in #fedora-meeting, iirc). I'm hoping that even if a newer, 1.8 ba

[EPEL-devel] Re: Django stable RPMs

2016-11-08 Thread Matthias Runge
On 08/11/16 16:31, Brian Bouterse wrote: > I believe the future of Django in EPEL is a topic that is being > discussed on the EPSCO meetings last week and this week (18:00 UTC on > Wednesdays in #fedora-meeting, iirc). > > I'm hoping that even if a newer, 1.8 based Django package is added to > EPE

[EPEL-devel] Re: Django stable RPMs

2016-11-08 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 8 November 2016 at 10:31, Brian Bouterse wrote: > I believe the future of Django in EPEL is a topic that is being discussed on > the EPSCO meetings last week and this week (18:00 UTC on Wednesdays in > #fedora-meeting, iirc). > > I'm hoping that even if a newer, 1.8 based Django package is adde

[EPEL-devel] Re: Django stable RPMs

2016-11-08 Thread Brian Bouterse
I believe the future of Django in EPEL is a topic that is being discussed on the EPSCO meetings last week and this week (18:00 UTC on Wednesdays in #fedora-meeting, iirc). I'm hoping that even if a newer, 1.8 based Django package is added to EPEL6, that the existing one named Django14 can be kept