On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:11:48AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:04 AM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:00:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > If Fedora and EPEL were to have older versions, we'd have to have a
> > > dedicated CDN endpoint for them
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:04 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:00:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > If Fedora and EPEL were to have older versions, we'd have to have a
> > dedicated CDN endpoint for them, because mirrors would seriously have
> > trouble taking it.
>
> How oft
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:00:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> If Fedora and EPEL were to have older versions, we'd have to have a
> dedicated CDN endpoint for them, because mirrors would seriously have
> trouble taking it.
How often would such packages be used? If we had a non-default repo
availab
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 6:42 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico Kadel-
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:05 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dne 22. 11. 21 v 15:00 Pavel Raiskup
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 05:20:00PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
> >I mean, seriously, RH should make this easy for Fedora packagers.
>
> +1
> and COPR and mock packagers in general.
Yes, but _I_ only have one lever. :)
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 03:10:58PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >- builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription (the no-cost variant is
> > OK as well, though [2])
>
> I cannot help myself but I consider this very unpleasant for EPEL packagers.
>
> Getting and configuring the subscription w
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:05 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > Dne 22. 11. 21 v 15:00 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
> > > Hello Fedora EPEL maintainers!
> > >
> > > First I don't feel comfortable announcing this, I'm not happy about the
> > >
Dne 22. 11. 21 v 15:00 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
Hello Fedora EPEL maintainers!
First I don't feel comfortable announcing this, I'm not happy about the
situation and so I don't want to be the lightning rod :-). But I believe
that we can come to acceptable Copr/Mock solution and this needs to be
Dne 22. 11. 21 v 17:57 Nico Kadel-Garcia napsal(a):
Which is precisely why pointing it to the 'stream' release seems the
only workable solution.
That is EPEL-next
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Next#Introduction
Miroslav
___
epel-devel mailing
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:55 AM Carl George wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:11 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 22. 11. 21 15:00, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > - builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription (the no-cost variant is
> > >OK as well, though [2])
> >
> > I cannot help mys
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 10:15, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:12 AM Carl George wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:37 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 22/11/2021 15:00, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > - builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription (th
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:12 AM Carl George wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:37 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 22/11/2021 15:00, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > - builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription (the no-cost variant is
> > >OK as well, though [2])
> >
> > I'm
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:37 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 22/11/2021 15:00, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > - builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription (the no-cost variant is
> >OK as well, though [2])
>
> I'm going to retire all my EPEL8 packages as I can't build/test them in
>
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:27 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 22. 11. 21 v 15:10 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >
> > However, enough of my personal views. Since we have not used RHEL for
> > copr/mock EPEL buidlroots until now, but we used
> > a downstream freely-available RHEL-copy (CentOS Linux), c
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:11 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 22. 11. 21 15:00, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > - builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription (the no-cost variant is
> >OK as well, though [2])
>
> I cannot help myself but I consider this very unpleasant for EPEL packagers.
>
> Getti
On 22. 11. 21 15:25, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
But EPEL is built against RHEL (not Alma, not Rocky).
True. As well as it is true today that it is not built against CentOS Linux
(and yet we do that in mock).
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
Dne 22. 11. 21 v 15:10 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
However, enough of my personal views. Since we have not used RHEL for copr/mock EPEL buidlroots until now, but we used
a downstream freely-available RHEL-copy (CentOS Linux), could we not continue doing so by using e.g. AlmaLinux?
For day to day
On 22. 11. 21 15:00, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
- builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription (the no-cost variant is
OK as well, though [2])
I cannot help myself but I consider this very unpleasant for EPEL packagers.
Getting and configuring the subscription was always so unfriendly for me
20 matches
Mail list logo
