[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposed incompatible security update for llhttp in EPEL9

2023-08-16 Thread Troy Dawson
The voting at the EPEL Steering Committee meeting was unanimous, with no negative votes. Please proceed. On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 1:20 PM Carl George wrote: > Thanks Ben for following the incompat process and for the detailed > email. It makes sense to me, the plan is sound, and I plan to vote >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposed incompatible security update for llhttp in EPEL9

2023-08-09 Thread Carl George
Thanks Ben for following the incompat process and for the detailed email. It makes sense to me, the plan is sound, and I plan to vote yes when we hold the official vote in next week's steering committee meeting. On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 1:35 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 4:11 PM

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposed incompatible security update for llhttp in EPEL9

2023-08-09 Thread Troy Dawson
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 4:11 PM Ben Beasley wrote: > This email proposes upgrading the llhttp package in EPEL9 from 6.0.10 to > 8.1.1, which would break the ABI and bump the SONAME version, under the > EPEL Incompatible Upgrades Policy[1]. > > The llhttp package is a C library (transpiled from Typ