ive been trying to rebuild their rpm using only the missing agents and
am having trouble getting the sources at a minimum. would someone be
able and interested in helping get these other agents into epel?
i am happy to test and will be a constant user, but not sure i am the
best for long term
i can give it a shot but not sure i am the best for long term
maintainer. happy to test and share diffs if i get to them too. i cant
test more than the pve package for what its worth.
On 2022-06-29 15:02, Carl George wrote:
Correct, a fence-agents-epel package is probably the best choice
Correct, a fence-agents-epel package is probably the best choice here.
Are you interested in creating and maintaining that? It's described
in further detail in the EPEL docs [0], although it's lacking
examples.
[0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-missing-sub-packages/
On
Carl,
it looks like this will not be included in centos stream per RH. so
looks like option 2 or 3 would be next right? to help the greater
community 3 might be better since other agents are missing too.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098360
On 2022-06-17 16:28, Carl George
was this the right place to open the bug or can it be moved to the right
spot please?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098360
On 2022-06-17 16:28, Carl George wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:31 AM Alex Talaran wrote:
would anyone be willing to package this in epel or help get
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:31 AM Alex Talaran wrote:
>
> would anyone be willing to package this in epel or help get it in the
> existing package please?
>
> i asked on bugzilla [1] but the current maintainer isnt able to help at
> the moment. from what i can tell it might just need uncommented in
