On 29 March 2018 at 14:43, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 13:46 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 11:53 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> > > Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 15:33 -0500, Rex D
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 13:46 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 11:53 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> > > Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 15:33 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> > > > > Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> > > > >
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 13:46 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 11:53 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 15:33 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > > > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, 2018-03-0
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 11:53 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 15:33 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> > > Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:15 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> > > > > I'd be ok with an epel7-only p
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 11:53 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 15:33 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:15 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > > > I'd be ok with an epel7-only python3-sip
> > > > >
> > > >
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 15:33 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:15 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> > > I'd be ok with an epel7-only python3-sip
>> > >
>> > > Since it is a new package (not a branch of an existing one), then
>> > > it
On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 15:33 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:15 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > I'd be ok with an epel7-only python3-sip
> > >
> > > Since it is a new package (not a branch of an existing one), then
> > > it
> > > would require a new pac
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:15 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> I'd be ok with an epel7-only python3-sip
>>
>> Since it is a new package (not a branch of an existing one), then it
>> would require a new package review.
>>
>> It would be a bit of shame though, having to fork things
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:15 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> I'd be ok with an epel7-only python3-sip
>
> Since it is a new package (not a branch of an existing one), then it
> would require a new package review.
>
> It would be a bit of shame though, having to fork things like that.
I tried this solu