#4: Decide on criteria to unretire packages. ----------------------------+---------------------------- Reporter: till | Owner: epel-wranglers Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Policy problem | Version: Keywords: | ----------------------------+---------------------------- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package defines the criteria to unretire packages in Fedora and in EPEL if the package is still active in Fedora. However there is now a request to unretire a package that is also retired in all branches for more than two weeks (at least in pkgdb): https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel- devel/2014-September/010212.html
Therefore the question is, whether a re-review is required. IMHO it does not make much sense for EPEL, since there should be no guideline changes that require adjusting the EPEL SPEC files. Nevertheless, I would like to get a consensus on this. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/epel/ticket/4> Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL> Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel