...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Fenzi
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2014 4:26 AM
To: epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: EPEL 7 package requests: pyephem, blt, tcllib, tdom
On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 21:06:47 -0700
Kyle Lanclos lanc...@ucolick.org wrote:
Christopher Meng wrote:
I guess you even
Actually the epel7 Request page should only be edited by the existing
packagers, or someone may get annoyed.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Zhiwei Zhu z_...@wargaming.net wrote:
Hi Christopher,
I have removed the part added by me. Sorry for the mistake.
Well no problem, you are new to here ;)
We need to focus on these packages now as they are required by people.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
This list is not the right place to discuss these stuffs.
If you want to let them land in the EPEL7, please fill bugs in Bugzilla
against the relevant component. I'm sure most of the owners of those
packages may not subscribe to this list.
___
Christopher Meng wrote:
This list is not the right place to discuss these stuffs.
If you want to let them land in the EPEL7,** please fill bugs in Bugzilla
against the relevant component.
Thanks for the pointer, I'll see if I can successfully navigate bugzilla.
The directions here:
Hi folks--
Our production Linux platform is CentOS, and EPEL nicely bridges the
gap between the base package set and what we need to support our
application base. I am grateful for the collective effort behind EPEL.
With just a handful of additional packages in EPEL 7, we would be
ready to begin
