While investigating https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=558462
I tracked it down to the fact that testing a folder's writability,
modifies the folder's timestamp if the folder is writable.
There is very similar (copied) logic in all the following places:
org.eclipse.equinox.launche
Hi,
I opened this enhancement request:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=558832
Without something that would let an application (the installer) know the
original value of the PATH before the native launcher has munged it, I
don't think there is any way to determine which java wi
Mickael,
It mostly starts here:
org.eclipse.osgi.storage.Storage.findVMProfile(Generation)
For Java 9 and higher it ends up here:
org.eclipse.osgi.storage.Storage.calculateVMProfile(Version)
While prototyping generating a profile I wrote some horrible code like
this, using reflection to
Sravan,
As far as I understand it, there exists no EPL/legal requirement to
provide corresponding source bundles for *any *binary bundles. It's of
course very nice to have when you want to debug the use of a framework,
but it's not an "OSS obligation," whatever that means. The fact that
al
What does it mean to deprecate "the API
package org.eclipse.osgi.service.resolver"? Does that affect the use of
things like org.eclipse.osgi.service.resolver.VersionRange,
org.eclipse.osgi.service.resolver.BundleDescription, and other things in
that package? These things are needed for stuff
entirely sure why that is API there, seems like an internal
implementation detail to be able to set the BundleDescription which
backs the implementation details of IPluginModel. Perhaps a more
realistic consideration would be to move the API to PDE.
Tom
- Original message -
e a political extremist; likely even an idiot.
But I'm an idiot who has a very hard time listening to an argument that
starts with the premise: I don't think 'we' have to care much about
'them'. That's not my Eclipse.
On 08.01.2021 17:50, Mickael Istria wr
Thomas,
Comments below
On 08.01.2021 20:07, Thomas Watson wrote:
I've certainly made fixes to this code long after Equinox has
stopped using it and I don't mind maintaining fixes there when
required. I do care enough to not break existing projects that are
using this API. After all, I do us
Christoph,
As I understand it, this is primarily used for self-hosted launches.
The way I read it, it modifies/augments the bundle's actual classpath
such that it works however the classpath normally works.
If you do a self-hosted launch, you can see the -dev argument from the
Properties..
FYI,
I updated the readme as displayed on this page
https://github.com/eclipse-equinox
to be more like this one
https://github.com/eclipse-pde/
I.e., with instructions about issue reporting and a link for
contribution details.
Also, I added this section to the contribution page:
https://g
Hi,
I don't see any good reason to keep equinox.aggrcon separate from
ep.aggrcon given it contributes the same repository and is always
changed in lock-step by the same person. Does anyone object if I merged
these two at the start of the 2022-09 cycle? I'll interpret silence as
agreement. :
It's not visible to me either... Maybe the link is wrong...
On 20.06.2022 11:59, Christoph Läubrich wrote:
Hm.. it seems this is not visible because I'm not part of the group...
that's really annoying...
Am 20.06.22 um 11:51 schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov:
We have
https://github.com/orgs/eclip
Aleksandar Kurtakov:
Link definitely is correct but seems to be "protected" in some way.
As a project lead I can even start discussion among project leads.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 1:02 PM Ed Merks <mailto:ed.me...@gmail.com>> wrote:
It's not visible to me either...
Mikael,
The draft is simple and looks fine.
Thanks,
Ed
On 10.08.2022 12:23, Mikael Barbero wrote:
Dear Equinox developers,
The Eclipse Foundation is willing to fund a security audit of the
recent changes to p2 to support detached signatures (made to replace
classical jars signing).
The Ec
signatures has been
completed. A report is available for review upon request
(limited to PMC members and committers). Mickael Istria and Ed
Merks participated in the audit and have seen early and final
versions of the report.
There are some findings in th
15 matches
Mail list logo
