Yes, I was filling out the NOT available times.
As a side note, I am trying to reduce meeting time in general and don't
plan on regularly attending these calls (ie, if I'm not doing any p2 work).
So if there is a p2 UI issue that makes the agenda, I'd appreciate a ping
on the p2 mailing list to en
We currently use ds in p2 to declare most of our services.
Yet we don't have any particular bundle that declares a dependency on ds.
I can justify this in some respects - theoretically there could be clients
that consume the p2 bundles, declare their own services (using ds or
dynamically) and th
Following up on this:
In the course of merging with the latest p2 code, upgrading to yesterday's
I-build, and fixing bugs, this problem has gone away. I can't explain why.
I didn't change the class structure of the classes involved.
susan
- Forwarded by Susan Franklin McCour
I've been wildly refactoring some p2 code in my workspace to play around
with some alternate API.
In doing so, I've broken the SDK's service registration for the UI Policy.
It seems I've got some kind of class circularity going on, but it's not
clear to me what the problem is.
The stack trace be
Hi
This may have been discussed before, but the times they are a changing...
I was reading about the FUDForum front end for Eclipse newsgroups [1] and
decided to give it a testdrive [2].
While looking at the forums listed underneath Eclipse Projects, I noticed
"P2 dev." I had forgotten tha
Configuring the UI in the 3.5 stream is discussed here:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/p2/Adding_Self-Update_to_an_RCP_Application
For the 3.4 stream, it requires changes in the UI bundles, I'm not sure if
anyone has tried it. I could answer any questions you might have (but
let's move the disc
In the p2 call this week
(http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/p2/Meetings/20081014#Minutes)
we talked about bug triage and trying to assign real owners to bugs. We
also mentioned assigning them directly within the team when we open a bug,
to avoid a bunch of bug noise.
Just now I opened a bug, assi
ours)
after everything is downloaded? Any examples? We are sophisticated plugin
writers. I’ll read
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_Touchpoint_Instructions. Looking for
any examples and “extension points”.
Thank you for the guidance.
farokh
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Farokh.
Most (all?) of the p2 core team are taking their vacations right now. I
work on the UI for p2, so while I use the core API, I don't know the exact
state of the underlying implementation and what limitations are there in
3.4 as well as those guys do. So consider this answer as a bit o
Hi, everyone.
Thanks for taking the time to attend the p2 UI walkthrough, it was helpful.
I've annotated the "prep page" with notes about the actual discussion that
took place. I've included links to existing bug reports on some of these
topics so that you can comment in individual bugs with ne
Hi, everyone.
To get some fresh eyes on the p2 UI and step back a bit before charging
into bug fixing, I scheduled a p2 UI design walkthrough with the Eclipse UI
Best Practices Working Group
(http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/User_Interface_Best_Practices_Working_Group).
I thought that the bac
Hi, everyone...
While it's still fresh in my mind, I've started to make the "big issues
list" for 3.5 for the p2 UI.
Please see
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_UI_Plan
for the current summary of work areas in the UI. I've tried to reference
bug numbers where possible so that folks can cc: th
There's been a long standing bug in the releng tools involving the analysis
of what bugs got fixed.
I've never tried to track it down, but I've seen it happen where certain
changes are always picked up and bugs are listed in the build notes when no
work was done.
Has anyone else noticed that these
It seems the projects were tagged for the I-build 1 minute before my last
fix was committed.
However, when I went to retag before the build started, I saw some launch
config changes coming in that I couldn't vouch for, so I didn't retag
immediately.
By the time I decided to retag only the UI, the
I tagged the p2 UI projects for the 1am build.
The map file has been updated for the following Bug changes:
+ Bug 228794. [ui] "Include items that have already been installed"
checkbox does not work properly (FIXED)
+ Bug 229305. [ui] Installing from a filtered selection does not work
(FIXED)
Th
Never mind...got it.
Funny how the mind thinks of new ideas right after a desperate cry for
help.
susan
- Forwarded by Susan Franklin McCourt/Beaverton/IBM on 04/30/2008 09:53
PM
If you've been experiencing weird behavior with the
[ ] Include items that are installed
checkbox on the p2 Available Software page, can you please help me?
The relevant bug is
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=228794
When first reported, I could not reproduce it.
Then I saw it.
I've just done some reorg and updating of the p2 test plan at
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_tests
I'd like to invite the community to help us in tomorrow's test pass, even
if and especially if you've not tried p2 before.
Now that the p2 UI is simply part of the default SDK, there's no magic
I barely missed the 6pm tag of the UI projects with a fix, so I've tagged
the p2 UI projects for the 1am build.
(I wasn't sure what other work might be planned for tonight and whether
anyone else would be tagging).
susan
The map file has been updated for the following Bug changes:
+ Bug 228892.
mailing list
Susan Franklin McCourt wrote:
>
>
>
> > - User interface for configuring/pausing/resuming/m
>Sorry, I realize I may have stepped on (Susan's) toes WRT the UI items
>below.
No worries, Scott!
> - User interface for configuring/pausing/resuming/managing downloads
Do you mean something at the ECF level? Or in p2?
In p2 we currently rely on the platform UI progress view rather than
present
at various stages in the UI progress or will end up with an
uninstallable set of IUs once the user presses "finish", but this can be
managed .
So thanks a lot again, I appreciate the quick responses!! :)
Ciao, hh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Helmut. I'll take a stab at these, although I don't know about #3.
1) First ask the user what hosts/archs etc. he
wants to install and then use that information in both the UI and the
installation itself. Is this possible at all?
The specific notion of considering the profile values for fil
ookups, not sure if that can be changed...
>
> So, thanks for this first bunch of answers!! :)
> Chao,
> hh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Franklin
> McCourt
> Sent: 27 March 2008 15:49
> To: Equinox
ed...
So, thanks for this first bunch of answers!! :)
Chao,
hh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Franklin
McCourt
Sent: 27 March 2008 15:49
To: Equinox development mailing list
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] p2 for starters
Hi,
Hi, Helmut.
I work on the p2 UI, so I can answer some of the UI questions and will
defer to the core guys to answer the rest..
>- Is p2 allowing nested groups like these:
>- Can you suggest a strategy on how to best filter a repos content, both
>based on users choices and entitlement? Is there
I've committed fixes to HEAD for these bugs:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=224180
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=224107
I did not tag/release, as John said he or Pascal will be doing it closer to
build time.
As of this moment, I believe I'm done with UI changes fo
Pascal suggested I go ahead and tag and update the map file.
So I did.
susan
- Forwarded by Susan Franklin McCourt/Beaverton/IBM on 03/11/2008 02:41
PM
I have released some surgical fixes to HEAD for these bugs:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=61
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=222000
The changes are in
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.ui
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.ui.sdk
If there is a rebuild, these should be ta
dle. If
you were to try to install it, then more trouble would occur :-)
If you can not depend on the p2 metadata generator, you can still get
inspiration from the BundleDescriptionFactory#getBundleDescription(File)
HTH,
PaScaL
From: Susan Franklin McCourt <[EMAIL PROT
I have a user workflow where I want to treat a jar file that is a bundle
differently than I treat a jar file that is just some archive of stuff.
Is there a definitive way that I should programmatically examine a jar file
and decide "this is a bundle."
I thought this would be relatively easy to fi
In the p2 call on Tuesday, Scott was asking if I had bandwidth for some
service discovery UI (in particular discovering p2 repos) before
EclipseCon.
I promised to make a prio list of UI work items so that I could answer that
question.
Please take a look at:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_UI_
>- Installable units have a type which is used to differentiate between
IUs.
>The name of this property is "org.eclipse.equinox.p2.type" and can
>currently take 2 values ("iu.fragment," "group"). Similarly to this type
we
>have the "categoryIU" property whose value can be set to "true". I'm
really
I tagged and released for tomorrow's I-build. I didn't see anyone else out
there tonight, so I assume I'm not catching anyone unprepared...
The map file has been updated for the following Bug changes:
+ Bug 210670. [prov] [ui] odd progress placement when adding update site
(FIXED)
+ Bug 214689.
ow
though - such as a trim widget that gets an error overlay added. In the
updates dialog, we would presumably still show the updates, and the user
can try the update from there if they want to.
John
et that gets an error overlay added. In the
updates dialog, we would presumably still show the updates, and the user
can try the update from there if they want to.
John
Susan Franklin McCourt
Hi, everyone.
I've been struggling with how to handle the case where the user has
automatic updates on, we find updates, but the resulting provisioning plan
for those updates is not OK. Meaning, there is some
incompatibility/problem. Do we tell the user? Do we let them try to
update anyway? e
Hi, Scott.
I hadn't read this thread yet this morning when you asked about discovery
UI.
Now I'm caught up
I think getting this into the admin UI should be trivial, we could just add
a "discovered" sites view behind the existing artifact/metadata repo views.
It's mostly just build issues.
The
Am I the only one seeing this when I try to use the URL below?
I haven't been able to connect to the test updates URL since it was
repopulated
!ENTRY org.eclipse.equinox.p2.ui 4 0 2008-01-31 19:21:01.156
!MESSAGE Error loading repository
http://update.eclipse.org/eclipse/testUpdates/
!STACK 1
I think I'd have to see the changes first, but my initial reaction is that
we probably want to get rid of IProfileRegistry.updateProfile(Profile).
I think profile registry would still have add/remove API, and API for
querying and getting the profiles. I don't see it necessary to make the
engine c
40 matches
Mail list logo
