by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/01/2007 09:28 AM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security
Both John and Rem are correct.
Bundles which
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security
I agree, we certainly should use Import-Package. And, from what I
understand, Scott is correct, the intention is to have Foundation 1.1 as a
minimum execution environment for those bundles.
From a practical side, I just
Hi Folks,
Some questions: I thought I understood (from Equinox Summit) that the
recently approved minimum EE for Equinox 3.4 (Ganymede) was CDC
1.1/Foundation 1.1.
I see from looking at the equinox JAAS integration bundles (e.g.
org.eclipse.equinox.security.auth) that the runtime
On 10/31/07, Scott Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand this, as the JAAS
work depends upon packages like javax.security.auth, and
javax.security.auth.login, etc. which do not seem to be in CDC
1.1/Foundation 1.1.
Those packages are marked as optional. I don't know how that all
works
On 10/31/07, Scott Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, so bundles that require those packages to compile or run would have
to specify EE of JRE 1.4 (or higher)...in other words they can't specifiy
1.1 and be assured of getting those optional packages. Please correct if
this is wrong in any
