+1
Jeff
McAffer/Ottawa/IB
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
McAffer/Ottawa/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/09/2007 11:05 PM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
[equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle
As you may know, we used to have
by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/10/2007 09:54 AM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle
In the long, there is no discussion about
this change. However the
benefits of doing it right away are not clear to me.
+0
PaScaL
From: Jeff McAffer/Ottawa/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: equinox-dev@eclipse.org
Date: 09/09/2007 11:07 PM
Subject:[equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle
Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle
+1
As for doing it now, is there any benefit to waiting
respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle
+1
As for doing it now, is there any benefit to waiting?
There is some amount
As you may know, we used to have the JARProcessor embedded in the bowels
of Update manager. Turns out that there are several uses for the
processor (pack200 support, signing, verifying, ...) and having this
function as a stand-alone bundle would be a good thing(tm). So in the
p2 work we did
] graduating the new jar processor bundle
As you may know, we used to have the JARProcessor embedded in the bowels
of Update manager. Turns out that there are several uses for the
processor (pack200 support, signing, verifying, ...) and having this
function as a stand-alone bundle would be a good
