On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 12:41:55 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
><< Said parameters, IIRC, define the orbit, but not where in
>the orbit the bird will be at any given moment. Not very useful. >>
>
>Actually, the reduced set is very useful to those attempting to fit an
>observation to an orbit for ei
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Gentlefolk,
>
> << Said parameters, IIRC, define the orbit, but not where in
> the orbit the bird will be at any given moment. Not very useful. >>
>
> Actually, the reduced set is very useful to those attempting to fit an
> observation to an orbit for either orbit
Gentlefolk,
<< Said parameters, IIRC, define the orbit, but not where in
the orbit the bird will be at any given moment. Not very useful. >>
Actually, the reduced set is very useful to those attempting to fit an
observation to an orbit for either orbit determination or recognition
purposes.
Alex Fraser wrote:
> There was a flurry of job talk on this list. I couldn't find it in a brief
> search, but as I remember it was about companies hiring people with rocketry
> experience. Was this flurry a result of star wars?
There were some recent comments to the effect that people with
a
I used the wrong word. Replace deployment with development. A system can
be deployed with troops trained for the purpose, but to develop it you need
people with lots of experience. I wonder where they are?
There was a flurry of job talk on this list. I couldn't find it in a brief
search