David Weinshenker wrote:
>
> Pierce Nichols wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 00:15, David Masten wrote:
> >
> > > I had figured that to yaw left decrease left engine thrust and increase
> > > right engine thrust simultaneously. Since opposite motors generate
> > > torque in the same direction
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 14:55, Pierce Nichols wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 00:15, David Masten wrote:
>
> > I had figured that to yaw left decrease left engine thrust and increase
> > right engine thrust simultaneously. Since opposite motors generate
> > torque in the same direction this should me
Pierce Nichols wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 00:15, David Masten wrote:
>
> > I had figured that to yaw left decrease left engine thrust and increase
> > right engine thrust simultaneously. Since opposite motors generate
> > torque in the same direction this should mean no (little) torque chan
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 00:15, David Masten wrote:
> I had figured that to yaw left decrease left engine thrust and increase
> right engine thrust simultaneously. Since opposite motors generate
> torque in the same direction this should mean no (little) torque change.
Neither the strategy y
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 19:30, John Carmack wrote:
> I just live with the cross-axis coupling, but you can rotate things a
> little and actually make the issue go away -- instead of thinking about
> throttling one engine up to pitch or yaw, throttle two adjacent engines up
> to rotate as if there
